DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Perceptions and Differences between Groups regarding Generative AI

생성형 AI에 관한 인식 및 집단간 차이 분석

  • 노규성 (한국소프트웨어기술인협회)
  • Received : 2024.01.18
  • Accepted : 2024.03.20
  • Published : 2024.03.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the use of generative AI and the perception of differences between user groups. This study explored the perceptions of different user groups regarding generative AI, aiming to derive implications for enhancing AI utilization capabilities for each group. Upon analysis, it was found that there were no significant differences in perceptions across age groups. However, notable differences were observed between professional backgrounds, particularly in the areas of generative AI application and ethical perspectives. Consequently, this study suggests the need for diversified AI solutions tailored to specific fields of expertise. It underscores the importance of customized education and training programs, as well as specialized education focused on ethical considerations. Additionally, this research contributes academically by proposing varied AI usage strategies for different age and professional groups. It also highlights the role of text mining techniques in developing and improving AI utilization skills.

본 연구는 생성형 AI의 활용 및 사용자 그룹 간 차이에 대한 인식을 분석하고자 하는 목적으로 가지고 있다. 본 연구는 생성형 AI 사용자 그룹 간 차이에 대한 인식을 조사하여 각 사용자층에 대한 AI 활용 역량 증진을 위한 시사점을 도출하였다. 검증 결과, 연령별 집단 간에는 유의적인 차이가 없으며, 전문적 배경에 의한 집단 간에는 생성형 AI 활용 분야와 생성형 AI의 윤리적 관점에서 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 이로 인해 본 연구는 전문 분야에 따라 다른 AI 솔루션 제공 및 맞춤형 교육 훈련 필요성, 윤리적 고려에 대한 특별한 교육과 문화 형성 등에 대한 대안을 제시하였다. 또한 텍스트 마이닝 기법을 통해 연령대별, 전문 분야별로 다른 방식의 AI 활용 및 활용 역량 개발 교육 등을 제안하였다는 점에서 학술적 기여를 했다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Mitchell, Melanie(2019). Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans. Amazon. 
  2. Tegmark, Max(2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Amazon. 
  3. O'Neil, Cathy(2016). Weapons of Math Destruction. Crown Books. 
  4. Noble, Safiya Umoja(2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press. 
  5. Murray, Seb. (2023). Why Generative AI Investments Are Surging in the U.S.. knowledge at wharton. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/why-generative-ai-investments-are-surging-in-the-u-s/ 
  6. Salesforce. (2023). Top Generative AI Statistics for 2023. News & Insights. https://www.salesforce.com/news/stories/generative-ai-statistics/ 
  7. S. K. Oh, M. J. Jang & J. E. Park. (2023). Undergraduates' Awareness of the Ethics of Generative AI Utilization in College Writing. Literacy Studies, 14(4) 69-96. 
  8. Apotheker, J. et al. (2024). From Potential to Profit with GenAI. BCG. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/from-potential-to-profit-with-genai 
  9. Chugh, Vidhi. (2023). Ethics in Generative AI. Datacamp. https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/ethics-in-generative-ai 
  10. Deloitte(2023). Many Executives Uncertain if Their Organizations Have Ethical Standards for Generative AI: Deloitte State of Ethics and Trust in Technology Report. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/press-releases/many-executives-uncertain-if-their-organizations-have-ethical-standards-for-generative-ai.html 
  11. Weidinger, Laura & Isaac, William(2023). Evaluating social and ethical risks from generative AI. DeepMind. 
  12. S. H. Lee(2023). A study on learners' digital literacy perceptions and performance diagnosis of problem-based learning using generative AI: Focusing on smart tourism students. Tourism Research Journal, 37(7) 129-145. 
  13. G. Lee(2023). University students' change of awareness and self-directed learning competencies after experience using and applying Chat GPT. University teaching and learning research, 16(3) 71-94. 
  14. Y. H. Lee(2023). Analysis of College Students' Perception about Generative Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT. A Treatise on The Plastic Media, 26(4) 46-55.  https://doi.org/10.35280/KOTPM.2023.26.4.6
  15. D. H. Choi, J. Y. Kim, E. Han & C. H. Oh(2023). Understanding User Perception of Generative AI and Copyright of AI-Generated Outputs: focusing on differences by user group. The journal of Convergence on Culture Technology, 9(1) 777-786. 
  16. Generative AI Research Group (2023). Generative AI prompt design. Gwangmungak Publishing Media.