DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggesting an Operating Model and Exploring the Feasibility of a Librarian Learning Community

사서학습공동체 도입 가능성 탐색 및 운영 모델 제안

  • 정영미 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이은주 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2024.02.26
  • Accepted : 2024.03.20
  • Published : 2024.03.30

Abstract

It is important to plan and operate various training programs at the national level to develop librarians' job performance expertise and future-oriented capabilities. The purpose of this study was to examine the possibility of introducing a librarian learning community as an training program at a professional education and training institution and to suggest an appropriate operation method. To this end, research was conducted using the following contents and methods: 1) theoretical discussion on program operation such as the concept, operation stages, and types of a librarian learning community through a review of related literature; 2) exploring the possibility of operating a librarian learning community through pilot operation and derivation of implications, 3) proposal of a librarian learning community operation model. This study reviewed the librarian learning community operating model through participant observation and participant opinion collection during the pilot operation process to minimize confusion in the early stages of implementation, and also presented an operational roadmap and support system for the successful establishment of the program in the future. There is a need to further develop the librarian learning community operating model presented in this study through implementation and empirical analysis over the next several years. However, the results of this study will also be useful as an initial operating model for a learning community for professional education and training in other fields.

사서의 직무수행 전문성과 미래지향적 역량 개발을 위해 국가적 차원에서 다양한 교육 프로그램을 기획·운영하는 것은 중요하다. 본 연구는 사서 전문교육훈련기관의 교육 프로그램으로 사서학습공동체의 도입 가능성을 검토하고 적절한 운영 방법을 제시하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 다음과 같은 내용과 방법으로 연구를 진행하였다 : 1) 관련 문헌 검토를 통해 사서학습공동체 개념, 운영 단계, 유형 등 학습공동체 운영에 관한 이론적 논의, 2) 시범 운영을 통한 사서학습공동체 운영 가능성 탐색 및 시사점 도출, 3) 사서학습공동체 운영 모델 및 지원 체계 제안. 본 연구는 시범 운영 과정에서 참여 관찰 및 참가자 의견수렴을 통해 사서학습공동체 운영 모델을 검토하여 시행 초기의 혼란을 최소화하고, 향후 프로그램의 성공적인 정착을 위한 운영 로드맵 및 지원체계를 함께 제시하였다. 향후 여러 해에 걸친 시행과 실증적 분석을 통해 본 연구에서 제시한 사서학습공동체 운영 모델을 더욱 정교하게 발전시킬 필요가 있다. 그렇지만 본 연구의 결과는 타분야 전문직 교육훈련을 위한 학습공동체의 초기 운영 모델로도 유용할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Act on the Capacity Development of Public Officials. Act No. 19062.
  2. Choi, Byeong-ik (2020). New normal 2.0, changes in local public institution education. Evaluation Institute of Regional Public Corporation, 31, 54-57.
  3. Han, Soonghee (2001). Lifelong Learning from the Perspective of Learning Ecology. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  4. Jeonbuk Education Policy Research Institute (2020). A Study on the Development of a Professional Learning Community Activity Scale in Schools. Jeonbuk: Jeollabuk-do Education Research and Information Institute.
  5. Jung, Youngmi & Noh, Younghee (2024). A survey of librarian' awareness and demand for librarian learning communities. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 58(1), 99-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2024.58.1.099
  6. Kang, Ji Hei, So, Byoung-Moon, & Jung, Youngmi (2024). A study on the introduction of professional learning communities for continuing education of librarian. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 58(1), 181-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2024.58.1.181
  7. Kim, Mihawan (2020). A Study on the Development of Mathematics Teacher Learning Community in Elementary School. Doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Education, Gyeongin National University of Education.
  8. Lee, Hong-Jae & Kang, Je-Sang (2005). A study on community of practice for the effectiveness knowledge management. Korean Policy Sciences Review, 9(4), 1-23.
  9. Library Act. Act No. 19592.
  10. National Library of Korea, Library Human Resources Development Department (2022). For Distribution of the Master Plan for Librarian Education and Training (2022-2026). Available: https://nl.go.kr/NL/contents/N50603000000.do?schM=view&page=1 &viewCount=9&id=42617&schBdcode=&schGroupCode=
  11. Seo, Kyoung-Hye (2009). Teacher learning communities and professional development. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(2), 243-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2009.26.2.243
  12. Seoul Education Research & Information Institute (2023). 2023 Inter-school Teacher Learning Community Guidebook (2023-15).
  13. Youn, Chang Gook (2002). A Study on Types and Characteristics of Arguments about 'Learning Community'. Mater's thesis, Department of Education Graduate School Seoul National University.
  14. DuFour, R. (2004). What is "professional learning community"? Educational Leadership, 61(6), 6-11.
  15. DuFour, R. & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional Learning Communities at Work: Best Practices for Enhancing Student Achievement. Reston: ASCD. 재인용: 김미환 (2020). 초등학교 학교 안 수학교사학습공동체 발달에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 경인교육대학교 교육전문대학원.
  16. Hargreaves, A. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micro-politics of teacher collaboration. In Blaise, J. ed. The Politics of Life in Schools. New York: Sage, 46-72.
  17. Hord, S. (1997). Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  18. Kilpatrick, S., Barrett, M., & Jones T. (2003). Defining learning communities. CRLRA Discussion Paper Series, D1.
  19. Nickols, F. (2003). Community of practice, an overview. Distance Consulting. Available: https://www.nickols.us/CoPOverview.pdf
  20. Tamizi, H. & Vreede, G. (2005, August 11-14). A facilitation task taxonomy for communities of practice. Paper presented at the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2005, Omaha, Nebraska.
  21. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: a framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
  22. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002) Cultivation Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.