• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.133-141
• /
• 2009

이 연구에서는 예비 과학교사들이 작성한 웹기반 반성저널을 분석하였다. 예비 과학교사들에게 4주간의 실습 기간 동안 매주 최소한 2개 이상의 반성저널을 웹 게시판에 작성하도록 안내하였다. 최종적으로 23명의 예비 과학교사가 작성한 307개의 웹기반 반성저널을 분석대상으로 선정하여, 주제 영역과 반성적 사고 수준을 분석하였다. 반성저널은 대부분 수업 준비나 자신의 수업에 대한 성찰과 같이 과학 수업 활동과 관련된 것들이었으며, 실습 진행에 따라 점차 빈도가 증가하였다. 과학 수업 활동과 직접적으로 연관이 있는 179개의 반성저널의 반성적 사고의 수준을 분석한 결과, 반성적 사고가 포함된 반성저널은 53개(29.6%)였는데, 상위 수준의 반성적 사고(전문적 반성과 비판적 반성)는 매우 적었지만, 상당수의 예비교사들이 웹기반 반성저널 쓰기 활동이 자신의 수업을 되돌아보고, 교육실습 활동의 기록을 남기는 데 도움이 된다고 인식하였다.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제16권5호
• /
• pp.127-154
• /
• 2020

Objective: This study aimed to show and analyze the flow, content, and meaning of (prospective) early childhood educators reflective thoughts entailed in the process of planning, implementing and evaluating storybook reading by analyzing reflective journals written by technical college students enrolled in an advanced major curriculum after they completed a storybook reading assignment. Methods: The subjects of this study were 39 technical college students enrolled in an advanced major curriculum that participated in a 15-week-long 'storybook seminar' course. This study analyzed journals on storybook reading written by the students as an assignment for the storybook seminar course. Results: As a result, four categories of selecting a storybook, planning the reading of the selected storybook, actual reading of the storybook and subsequent activities were extracted according to the implementation process of storybook reading. Through this series of experiences, (prospective) early childhood educators had a childt-centered view of reading picture books, changed the method of reading picture books, re-recognized the importance of early childhood literature education, and developed a will to develop professionalism through reflective thinking. Conclusion/Implications: This study finds its meaning in showing the reflective thinking that occur within early childhood educators that plan, implement and evaluate storybook reading.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.42-49
• /
• 2017

This study is about the influence of recording reflective journals and receiving feedback from professors on academic achievements in technical writing. We analyzed the differences between the test group who had recorded reflective journals and getting feedback, and the control group who had gotten feedback without reflective journals. And we compared academic achievements by conducting both professor evaluation and peer evaluation in technical writing. The results showed better learning effect, learning satisfaction and academic achievements in the test group than the other.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.372-385
• /
• 2012

For decades, reflection has been recognised as a meaningful tool to bring forth teachers' ownership as well as knowledge and action empowerment in teacher education. Yet there have been few studies on elementary teachers' reflection on their science teaching in Korea. In this study, 71 reflective journals of 24 elementary teachers on their science teaching were analyzed. The characteristics of reflective journals were analyzed in terms of 'productive reflection', a concept suggested by Davis (2006). Unproductive reflection is mainly descriptive without analysis, whereas productive reflection can promote teachers' learning by integrating four aspects of teaching (learner/learning, subject matter knowledge, instruction and assessment). The result showed what elementary teachers consider and emphasize and how they integrate their ideas. Most of reflective journals included aspects of 'instruction', 'learner/learning', and 'subject matter knowledge'. However 'instruction' was emphasized most frequently (69.0%) than 'subject matter knowledge' (33.8%) and 'learner/learning' (26.8%). 'Assessment' was hardly included nor emphasized. More than half of the journals (56.3%) showed no integrations, which were unproductive reflection. A third of the journals (32.4%) integrated only two aspects among four. Average score of integrations was 1.6 on a scale of 4 points. The integrations were not affected by the length of reflective journals and the teaching experience. These findings suggest that productive reflection would not increase naturally with teaching experience and there needs more tactful guidance to develop elementary teachers' productive reflection on their science teaching.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.322-334
• /
• 2014

In this study, the researcher aimed to increase productive reflection of pre-service elementary teachers through meta-analysis of their own reflective journals. The meta-analysis activities are expected to enhance their learning effectively as a kind of self-assesment. During 8 week simulation teaching, 26 pre-service teachers kept individual journal writing and the meta-analysis activities were implemented twice (after the 3rd and 8th week). Right after the first meta-analysis, the pre-service teachers' productive reflection increased clearly. However this would not guarantee the effect would last long time period. By analyzing 8 week reflective journals, reports on meta-analysis activities and small group interview, this study shed light on practical ways of enhancing reflective teacher education.

• 한방안이비인후피부과학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.186-201
• /
• 2019

Objectives : The aim of this study is to develop clinical practice program using reflective journals in the department of Korean medicine ophthalomology & otolaryngology & dermatology. Methods : It was applied to clinical practice and considered the adequacy of the clinical practice program using reflective journal for students who complete the clinical practice. Result : Students are given high marks for self-directed learning and Korean medicine ophththalomology & otolaryngology & dermatology professional learning.

• 기본간호학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.430-439
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to contribute to the development of an efficient teaching-learning method by analyzing effects of writing reflective journals on meta-cognition and problem solving ability in nursing students in education applying blended learning for fundamental nursing skills. Methods: The research design was a one-group pretest-posttest design, done to assess changes in meta-cognition and problem solving ability. Participants were 63 nursing students taking the fundamental nursing skills course at one college in Gyeonggi Province. The course was offered from March 21 to June 3, 2016. Data were collected using pre and post tests given before and after writing of reflective journals in blended learning. Data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA, $Scheff{\acute{e}}^{\prime}s$ test and paired t-test with SPSS Statistics version 20.0. Results: The results of this study show that scores for meta-cognition and problem solving ability of these students were all above average. There was a statistically significant difference in meta-cognition between pre and post writing of reflective journals but not for problem-solving ability. Conclusion: The findings indicate that writing a reflective journal in blended learning is an efficient teaching-learning method to improve meta-cognition in nursing students.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.703-716
• /
• 2012

본 연구에서는 교사의 학습이 일어날 수 있는 반성을 Davis(2006)의 '생산적 반성'으로 개념화하고 생산적 반성의 관점에서 초등 예비교사의 반성 저널 44개를 분석하였다. '생산적 반성'이란 한마디로 교사의 학습을 증진시킬 수 있는 반성을 말하며 반대로 '비생산적인 반성'이란 수업의 여러 측면들을 단순히 기술하며 분석이 거의 없고, 여러 아이디어를 연관시키기보다는 나열만 하는 경우를 말한다. 생산적 반성이 일어나고 있는지의 여부는 수업의 제 측면('지도', '내용 지식', '학습자/학습', '평가')을 얼마나 연결지어 생각하는지(통합), 그리고 얼마나 분석적으로 생각하는지(분석)로 살펴볼 수 있다. 분석 결과 초등 예비교사는 자신의 수업에 대한 반성에서 대부분 '지도', '내용 지식', '학습자/학습'의 세 측면을 포함하고 있지만(86.4%) '학습자/학습'이나 '내용 지식'의 측면을 강조하는 경우(각각 36.4%, 15.9%)보다는 '지도'측면을 강조하는 경우가 훨씬 많았다(86.4%). 이에 반해 '평가'측면은 반성 저널에서 언급된 경우가 거의 없으며 전혀 강조되고 있지도 않았다. 수업의 제 측면을 연관 지어 생각하거나 분석적으로 생각하는 생산적 반성의 수준은 다소 낮은 것으로 나타났다(4점 만점에 1.8점). 반성 저널의 대부분은 '학습자/학습'과 '지도'두 가지 측면에서만 통합을 보였으며(72.7%) 전혀 통합이 없는 저널도 22.7%나 되었다. 이러한 결과는 예비교사가 수업에서 일어난 일을 해석하고 수업의 대안을 모색하는 과정에서 평가 측면을 보다 주목하고 고려할 수 있도록 하고, 피드백이나 토론 등을 통하여 수업의 제 측면을 연관시키고 통합시킬 수 있도록 안내하는 것이 필요함을 시사한다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.401-420
• /
• 2014

This study aims to analyze middle school students' systemic thinking to express organic relations between different organ systems about the movement of food and air and teachers' reflective thinking about science teaching through their reflective journals after the lesson of digestion, circulation, respiration and excretion. Firstly, when investigating the moving route of hamburger eaten inside the body, students expressed the names, locations and forms of organs in the digestive system more than those in the circulatory system or the excretory system. When investigating the moving route of a painkiller taken inside the body, students seemed to have more difficulty in expressing the related organ systems than when investigating the moving route of other things, and they mostly drew pictures of organs in the digestive system as done for the moving route of hamburger. However, when investigating the moving route of water drunk inside the body, students mostly described organs in the digestive system but drew more pictures of organs in the excretory system, than when investigating the moving route of other things. When investigating the moving route of air inhaled inside the body, students mostly drew pictures of organs in the respiratory system, but the rate of their drawing pictures of circulatory organs was low. Secondly, this study analyzed one of the teachers' reflective journals, named Mr. Park. According to his journal, students showed different levels of understanding of organ names, depending on their degrees of familiarity with each organ, and in regard to the locations of organs, science teachers mostly aim to achieve learning objectives so much that they often forget to instruct the locations of organs in fact. As for the forms of organs, science teachers mostly spend so much time explaining the functions of organs that they often forget to describe the exact form of each organ.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제53권1호
• /
• pp.1-24
• /
• 2014

This study examines the effects of reflective journal writing on the mathematics self-efficacy in reciprocal peer tutoring. Participants were 38 high school students in Gyeonggi province who attended at a summer intensive mathematics course for 4 weeks. This study used a mixed method. SPSS 21.0 program was used to analyze the quantitative data, and the interviews, observational journals and reflective journals of 6 students were used to analyze qualitative data. According to the results, all the subcategories of mathematics self-efficacy, - mathematics problem-efficacy, mathematics success-efficacy, mathematics learning-efficacy, and mathematics subject-efficacy - improved except mathematics occupation-efficacy. In case of mathematics success-efficacy and mathematics problem-efficacy, students revealed the greatest improvement. In conclusion, reflective journal writing in reciprocal peer tutoring could be suggested as a treatment program to improve students' mathematics self-efficacy.