Journal of Families and Better Life (가정과삶의질연구)

Korean Home Management Association (가정과삶의질학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Stages of Development of Corporate Family-Friendly Policies and Programs

일-가족 조화를 위한 가족친화적 기업정책의 발달단계에 관한 연구

  • Choi Sung-Il (Dept. of Child & Family Studies, College of Human Ecology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Yoo Gye-Sook (Dept. of Child & Family Studies, College of Human Ecology, Kyung Hee University)
  • 최성일 (경희대학교 생활과학대학 아동가족) ;
  • 유계숙 (경희대학교 생활과학대학 아동가족)
  • Published : 2006.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to introduce the evolution of corporate family-friendly policies and programs, a recent business issue throughout the world. In addition, this study suggests implications for a corporate reference guide to work-family policies and programs by providing a comparative analysis of the typical stages of development of U.S. corporate family-friendly policies and programs, and by presenting model initiatives of Korean and American family-friendly companies. Just as technological changes at the time of the Industrial Revolution altered the relationship between workers and their work, more recent technological advances have again transformed this relationship, offering the promise of a society in which work demands a smaller portion of the worker's time and permitting the worker more freedom and control over work conditions. These new work arrangements have the promise of producing a new paradigm for work and family, based on which many industrialized nations have developed family-friendly policies already. Family-friendly policies and programs can be grouped into four discernable stages in the evolution of a corporate work-family agenda. According to these stages, most companies in Korea are in the predevelopment stage or stage 1. Development of scales to assess company family-friendliness is needed to create a family-friendly workplace environment, policies, and programs. It is critical that companies have champions who have the vision to step out in kent, and the determination to ensure that the family-friendly programs are solidly grounded. Companies should develop their work-family initiatives as an integral part of a program for managing diversity focusing on needs of women and minority employees.

Keywords

References

  1. 강혜련(1999). 주요 선진국의 가족친화적 기업정책 비교연구. 경영논총, 17(2), 7-30
  2. 강혜련(2002). 기업의 가족친화적 복지정책과 여성인력의 생산성. 생산성논집, 16(1), 1-23
  3. 김정한, 박찬임, 오학수(2004). 기업복지의 실태와 정책과제. 노동연구원
  4. 김태홍, 고인아(2001). 가족친화적인 고용정책의 현황과 활성화방안. 한국여성개발
  5. 노동부(2005). 앞서가는 고용평등 우수기업.2004년도 노동부 우수기업 선정사례
  6. 문국현(2005). 세계가 배우는 한국기업의 희망 유한킴벌리. 한스미디어
  7. 문신용, 윤기찬(2005). 가정친화적 복지제도에 대한 비교분석. 한국사회와 행정연구, 16(1), 445-473
  8. 삼성경제연구소(2004). CEO Infonnation. 삼성경제연구소 460, 1-21
  9. 안병철(2004). 기업의 가족친화적 제도에 대한 일 고찰. 사회복지정책, 19,71-83
  10. 원숙연(2005). 일-가정양립지원정책을 둘러싼 수사와 현실-출산휴가 및 육아휴직을 중심으로 한 탐색적 사례 연구. 한국정책학회보, 14(2), 157-275
  11. 이은욱(2005). 건강가족실천과 가족친화정책. 한국가족관계학회 2005년도 추계학술대회 발표원고
  12. 이주희(2003). 일과 가족의 양립은 어떻게 가능한가?- 기업의 조직문화화 여성관리직 모성보호- 가족과 문화, 15(3), 37-61
  13. 임인숙(2003). 한국 기업의 가족친화적 제도의 한계. 가족과 문화, 15(3), 63-86
  14. 장은미, 정기선(2003). 미국의 기업과 가족친화적 정책. 한국가족학회 2003년도 춘계학술대회 발표원고. 17-47
  15. 정기선, 장은미(2005). 가족친화적 정책이 종업원들의 조직몰입에 미치는 효과. 가족과 문화, 17(1), 59-84
  16. 정영금(2002). 가족-일 통합을 위한 가족친화적 정책의 필요성과 방향. 한국가족자원경영학회지, 6(2), 143-155
  17. 정영금(2004). 가족친화적 정책을 통한 일-가족 균형에 관한 연구. 한국가정관리학회지, 22(5), 91-100
  18. 조경호, 이선우(2001). 중아정부의 가정친화적 인사정책에 관한 실태분석. 공무원 후생복지제도 개선 참고자료
  19. 통계청(2005). 경제활동인구조사. 서울: 통계청
  20. 한국능률협회(2005). 한국에서 가장 존경받는 기업
  21. 한국생산성본부(1995). 산업인력의 근로의욕 실태조사
  22. Appelbaum, H(1992). The concept of work. Albany State University of New York Press
  23. Bailyn, L.(1993). Breaking the mold. New York: The Free Press
  24. Bond, J. E, Galinsky & J. Swanberg(1998). The 1997 national study of the changing UXYrkfvrce. New York Families & Work Institute
  25. Coughlan, A. (2005). Work-life balance. National University of Ireland, Maynooth
  26. Daft, R. I. & K E. Weic.(1984). Toward a model of organization as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295 https://doi.org/10.2307/258441
  27. Etzioni, A. (1993). Children of the universe. Utne Reader(May / June), 52-61
  28. Friedman, D. E. & Johnson, A. A. (1996). Mauing from programs to culture change: The next stage for the corporate work-family agenda. New York: Families and Work Institute
  29. Ferguson, M.(1980). The aquarian conspiracy: personal and social transformation in the 1980s. Los Angels: J.P. Tarcher
  30. Galinsky, E.(1994). Families and work: the importance of the quality of the work environment. In S. L. Kagan and B. Weissbourd(Eds.), Putting families first. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 112-136
  31. Galinsky, E., Friedman, D. S. & Hernandez, C. A(l991). The corporate reference guide. New York: Families and Work Institute
  32. Gonyea, J. & B. K. Googins. (1996). The restructuring of work and family in the united states: a new challenge for american corporations. In The Work Family Challenge, edited by S. Lewis and J. Lewis, 63-78. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  33. Goodstein, J.(1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: employer involverrent in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350-382 https://doi.org/10.2307/256833
  34. Grimsley, K D.(1997). 35% of firms found to monitor UXJTkers electronically. The Washington Post, May 23, Fl
  35. Guest, G.(2001). Perspectives on the study of umk-lift balance. A discussion paper prepared for the 2001 ENOP Symposium, Paris, March 29-31
  36. Lewis, S.(l997). Family friendly employment policies: a route to changing organizational culture or playing about at the margins? Gender, Work and Organization, 4, 13-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00020
  37. Lewis,S., Smithson, J., Cooper, C. & Dyer, J.(2001). Flexible futures: flexible working and work-lift integration. Summary of findings from stage one of project. Work-Life Research Centre, UK
  38. Milliken, F. J., J. E. Dutton & J. M. Beyer.(1990). Understanding organizational adaptation to change: the case of work-family issues. Human Resource Plannin, 13, 91-107
  39. Naisbitt, J. & Aburdene, P.(1985). Reinventing the corporation. New York: Warner Books, 7-8
  40. Oliver, C.(1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16, 145-179 https://doi.org/10.2307/258610
  41. Osterman, P.(l995). Work/family programs and the employment relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 681-700 https://doi.org/10.2307/2393758
  42. Perry-Smith, J. & Blum, T.(2000). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1107-1117 https://doi.org/10.2307/1556339
  43. Rifkin, J.(1996). The end of work. the decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. Jeremy P. Tarcher
  44. Romzek, B. S.(1991). Balancing work and non work obligation, in Carolyn Ban and Norma M. Riceucci(eds.) Public Personnel Management. New York, NY: Logman, 227-239
  45. Swoboda, F.(1993). For growing ranks of part-titre workers. The Washington Post, August 5
  46. Tugan, B.(1996). Managing generation X. Capstone, Oxford
  47. Wallen, J.(2002). Balancing uurk and fumily. Allyn and Bacon
  48. Wooten, L. P.(2001). What makes women-friendly public accounting firms tick? the diffusion of human resource management knowledge through institutional and resource pressures. Sex Roles, 45(5/6), 277-297 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014353413496