Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

THE HISTOLOGIC STUDY OF BONE HEALING AFTER HORIZONTAL RIDGE AUGMENTATION USING AUTO BLOCK BONE GRAFT

자가골 블럭 이식을 이용한 수평골 증강술시 이식골의 치유

  • Oh, Jae-Kwen (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University Dental School) ;
  • Choi, Byung-Jun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University Dental School) ;
  • Lee, Baek-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kyung Hee University Dental School)
  • 오재권 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최병준 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이백수 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2009.04.13
  • Accepted : 2005.05.18
  • Published : 2009.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the long term bone healing after horizontal ridge augmentation using auto block bone graft for implant installation timing. Materials and Methods: Five Beagle dogs(which were 14 months old and weighted approximately 10kg). In surgery 1(extraction & bone defect), premolars(P2, P3,P4) were extracted and the buccal bone plate was removed to create a horizontally defected ridge. After three months healing, in surgery 2(ridge augmentation). Auto block bone grafts from the mandibular ramus were used in filling the bone defects were fixed with stabilizing screws. The following fluorochrome labels were given intravenously to the beagle dogs: oxytetracycline 1week after the surgery, alizarin red 4 weeks after the surgery, calcein blue 8 weeks after the surgery. The tissue samples were obtained from the sacrificed dogs of 1, 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks after the surgery. Non-decalcified sections were prepared by resin embedding and microsection to find thickness of $10{\mu}m$ for the histologic examination and analysis. Results: 1. We could achieve the successful reconstruction of the horizontal bone defect by auto block bone graft. The grafted bone block remained stable morohologically after 16 weeks of the surgery. 2. In the histologic view. We observed osteoid tissue from the sample $4^{th}$ week sample and active capillary reconstruction in the grafted bone from the $12^{th}$ week sample. Healing procedures of auto bone grafts were compared to that of the host bone. 3. Bone mineralization could be detected from the $8^{th}$ week sample. 4. Fluorochrome labeling showed active bony changes and formation at the interface of the host bone and the block graft mainly. Bony activation in the grafted bone could be seen from the $4^{th}$ week samples. Conclusions: Active bone formation and remodeling between the grafted bone and host bone can be seen through the revascularization. After the perfect adhesion to host bone, Timing of successful implant installation can be detected through the ideal ridge formation by horizontal ridge augmentation.

Keywords

References

  1. Thomas A, David LC, Daniel B : Lateral ridge augmentation using defferent bone fillers and barrier membrane application. Clin. Oral Impl Res 12 : 260, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003260.x
  2. Urist MRB : Formation by autoinduction.Science 150 : 893, 1965 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3698.893
  3. Burchardt H : The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Rel Res 174 : 28, 1983
  4. Kim YG, Yoon BW, Ryu DM et al : A study on the bone formation of graft material containing demineralized bone matrix with a simultaneous installation of implant. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 31 : 481, 2005
  5. Kostopoulos L, Karring T : Augmentation of the mandible using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Impl Res 5 : 75, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050203.x
  6. Dahlin C, Lindhe A, Gottlow J et al : Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plastic Reconst Surg 81 : 672, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198805000-00004
  7. Ilizarov GA : The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues : Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 238 : 249, 1989
  8. Oh JH, Kim JD, Kim YG et al : Implant Restoration after Alveolar Distraction o Anterior Mandible : A Case Report, The Journal of Kyung Hee University Medical Center 21/1 : 91, 2005
  9. Buser D, Dula K, Hirt HP et al : Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes. A clinical study in 40 partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 420, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90113-5
  10. Roccuzzo M, Ramieri G, Spada MC et al : Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation by means of a titanium mesh and autogenous bone grafts. Clin Oral Impl Res 15 : 73, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00998.x
  11. Albrektsson T : The healing of autogenous grafts varying degrees of surgical trauma. J Bone Joint Surg 14 : 1, 1980
  12. Donos N, Kostopoulos L, Karring T : Augmentation of the rat jaw with autogenic cortico - cancellous bone grafts and guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Impl Res 13 : 192, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130210.x
  13. Buser D, Dula K, Hess D et al : Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes. J Periodontol 19 : 151, 2000
  14. Araujo MG, Sonohara M, Hayacibara R et al : Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of grafts comprised of autologous bone or a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 29 : 1122, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.291213.x
  15. Stoelinga PJ, Tideman H, Berger JS : Interpositional bone graft augmentation of the atrophic mandible: a preliminary report. J Oral Surg 36 : 30, 1978
  16. Park HW, Lee BS : A histologic study of bone formation according to different cryoprotectants during cryopreservation of bone. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 31 : 228, 2005
  17. Jensen J, Sindet PS : Autogenous mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of the severely atrophic maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 : 1277, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90303-4
  18. Marx R E : Clinical applications of Bone biology to mandibular and maxillary reconstructions. Clin Plas Surg 21 : 377, 1994
  19. Kerwin SC, Lewis DD, Elkins AD : Bone grafting and banking. Compen Con Edu Pra Veteri 3 : 1558, 1991
  20. Younger EM, Chapman MW : Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trau 3 : 192, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-198909000-00002
  21. Evian CI, Rosenberg ES, Coslet JG et al : The osteogenic activity of bone removed from healing extraction sockets in humans. J Clin Periodontol 53 : 81, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1982.53.2.81
  22. Kim YG, Kim SG, Lee BK : Bone graft and Implant Vol 1. Bone Biology anBone graft materials, Narae Publishing, Inc. 13, 2005
  23. Donos N, Karring T : Long-term stability of autogenous bone grafts following combined application with guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 19 : 80, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01104.x
  24. Phillips JH, Rahn BA : Fixation effects on membranous and endochondral onlay bone graft revascularization and bone deposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 85 : 891, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199006000-00009
  25. Matthias AWM, Japp CM, Hans MF et al : Incorporation of particulated bone implants in the facial skeleton. Biomaterials 20 : 2029, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00105-2
  26. Axhausen W : Osteogenic phase of regeneration of bone : A historical and experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg 38 : 593,1956
  27. Arun KG : Bone & Biology, Harvesting, Grafting for Dental Implants. Rationale and Clinical Applications. Quintessence Pub 12, 2004
  28. Decker B, Bartels H : Relationships between endothelial cells, pericytes, and osteoblasts during bone formation in the sheep femur following implantation of tricalciumphosphate-ceramic. Anatomic Record 242 : 310, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092420304
  29. Mashiba T, Hui S, Turner CH et al : Bone remodeling at the iliac crest can predict the changes in remodeling dynamics, micredamage accumulation, end mechanical properties in the lumbar vertebrae of dogs. Calcif Tissue Int 77 : 180, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-005-1295-x
  30. Lee TC, Moshin S, Taylor D et al : Detecting microdamage in bone. J Anat 203 : 161, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00211.x
  31. Mori S, Burr DB : Increased intracortical remodeling following fatigue damage. Bone 14 : 103, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90235-3
  32. Chiapasco M, Abati S : Clinical outcome of autogenous bone blocks or guided bone regeneration with e-PTFE membranes for the reconstructionof narrow edentulous ridge. Clin Oral Impl Res 10 : 278, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100404.x
  33. Park YG : Bone Histomorphometry. Kyung-Hee Pub 43, 2004
  34. Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR et al : Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9 : 13, 1994
  35. Fumiaki M, Kunikazu T, Koichi W : Widespread calcium deposits, as detected using the alizarin red S technique, in the nervous system of rats treated with dimethyl mercury. Neuropathology 20 : 210, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1789.2000.00341.x
  36. Parfitt AM : The physiologic and clinical significance of bone histomorphometric data. CRC Pres 143, 1983
  37. Atwood D : Post extraction changes in adult mandible as illustrated by microradiograph of midsagittal section and serial cephalometric roetgengrams. J Prosthet Dent 13 : 810, 1963 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90225-7
  38. Carlsson H, Thilander H, Hedegard B : Histologic changes in the upper alveolar process after extractions with or without insertion of an immediate full denture. Acta Odontol Scand 25 : 21, 1967 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356709072521