DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Cu Hybrid Structure by Controlling Surfactant

계면활성제 함량 조절을 통한 구리 하이브리드 구조물의 화학 기계적 평탄화

  • 장수천 (부산대학교 하이브리드소재솔루션 국가핵심연구센터) ;
  • 안준호 (지앤피테크놀로지(주)) ;
  • 박재홍 ;
  • 정해도 (부산대학교 하이브리드소재솔루션 국가핵심연구센터)
  • Received : 2012.09.20
  • Accepted : 2012.10.15
  • Published : 2012.11.27

Abstract

Recently, the demand for the miniaturization of package substrates has been increasing. Technical innovation has occurred to move package substrate manufacturing steps into CMP applications. Electroplated copper filled trenches on the substrate need to be planarized for multi-level wires of less than $10{\mu}m$. This paper introduces a chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) process as a new package substrate manufacturing step. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of surfactant on the dishing and erosion of Cu patterns with the lines and spaces of around $10/10{\mu}m$ used for advanced package substrates. The use of a conventional Cu slurry without surfactant led to problems, including severe erosion of $0.58{\mu}m$ in Cu patterns smaller than $4/6{\mu}m$ and deep dishing of $4.2{\mu}m$ in Cu patterns larger than $14/16{\mu}m$. However, experimental results showed that the friction force during Cu CMP changed to lower value, and that dishing and erosion became smaller simultaneously as the surfactant concentration became higher. Finally, it was possible to realize more globally planarized Cu patterns with erosion ranges of $0.22{\mu}m$ to $0.35{\mu}m$ and dishing ranges of $0.37{\mu}m$ to $0.69{\mu}m$ by using 3 wt% concentration of surfactant.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Kondo, T. Yonezawa, D. Mikami, T. Okubo, Y. Taguchi, K. Takahashi and P. Barkey, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152(11), H173 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2041047
  2. T. Kobayashi, J. Kawasaki, K. Mihara and H. Honnma, Electrochim. Acta, 47, 85 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00592-8
  3. K. Takahashi, H. Terao, Y. Tomita, Y. Yamaji, M. Hoshino, T. Sato, T. Morifuji, M. Sunohara and M. Bonkohara, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 40, 3032 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.40.3032
  4. C. Andricacos, C. Uzoh, J. O. Dukovic, J. Horkans and H. Deligianni, IBM J. Res. Dev., 42, 567 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.425.0567
  5. S. Ra, C. Lee, J. Cho, S. Lee, J. Lee, M. Hong and J. Kwak, Curr. Appl. Phys., 8, 675 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2007.04.048
  6. H. Lee, B. Park and H. Jeong, Microelectron. Eng., 85, 689 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2007.12.044
  7. H. Lee, S. Joo and H. Jeong, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 209, 6134 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.027
  8. K. Noh, N. Saka and J. -H. Chun, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 53(1), 463 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60740-9
  9. Z. Li, K. Ina, P. Lefevre, I. Koshiyama and A. Philipossian, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152(4), G299 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1869974