Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지

Economical Values of Gage R&R Parameters

경제적인 Gage R&R 계수

  • Park, Sung-Hun (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kang, Chang-Wook (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 박성훈 (한양대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 강창욱 (한양대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2012.07.12
  • Accepted : 2012.07.24
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Companies strive for quality improvement and use process data obtained through measurement process to monitor and control the process. Measurement data contain variation due to error of operator and instrument. The total variation is sum of product variation and measurement variation. Gage R&R is for repeatability and reproducibility of measurement system. Gage R&R study is usually conducted to analyze the measurement process. In performing the gage R&R study, several parameters such as the appropriate number of operators (o), sample size of parts (p), and replicate (r) are used. In this paper we propose how to determine the optimal combination of number of operators (o), sample size of parts (p), and replicates (r) considering measurement time and cost by statistical method.

Keywords

References

  1. 이승훈; 측정시스템 분석, 청문각, 137-139, 2000.
  2. 이승훈; Minitab 측정시스템 분석, 이레테크, 49-50, 2006.
  3. 최성운; "측정시스템 분석 모형의 고찰 및 새로운 모형의 제안", 대한안전경영과학회지, 10(1) : 191-195, 2008.
  4. Andy, K. L. and Chiang; "A Simple General Method for Constructing Confidence Intervals for Functions of Variance Components," Technometrics, 43(3) : 356-367, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017001316975943
  5. Andy, K. L. and Chiang; "Improved Confidence Intervals for a Ratio in an R&R Study," Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 31(3) : 329-344, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1081/SAC-120003845
  6. Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG); "Measurement Systems Analysis," AIAG Reference Manual 4th edition, Southfield, MI, 2010.
  7. Barrentine, L. B.; Concepts for R&R Studies, ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI., 1991.
  8. Borror, C. M., Montgomery, D. C., and Runger, G. C.; "Confidence intervals for Variance Components from Gauge Capability Studies," Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 13(6) : 361-369, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199711/12)13:6<361::AID-QRE126>3.0.CO;2-2
  9. Burdick, R. K. and Larsen, G. A.; "Confidence Intervals on Measures of Variability in R&R Studies," Journal of Quality Technology, 29(3) : 261-273, 1997.
  10. Kristynn, K. Dolezal, Richard K. Burdick, and Nancy J. Birch; "Analysis of a Two-Factor R&R Study with Fixed Operators," Journal of Quality Technology, 30(2) : 163-170, 1998.
  11. Liyun Gong, Burdick, R. K., and Jorge Quiroz; "Confidence Intervals for Unbalanced Two-factor Gauge R&R Studies," Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21(8) : 727-741, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.682
  12. Lorraine Daniels, Richard K. Burdick, and Jorge Quiroz; "Confidence Intervals in a Gauge R&R Study with Fixed Operators," Journal of Quality Technology, 37(3) : 179-185, 2005.
  13. Michael Hamada and Sam Weerahandi; "Measurement System Assessment Via Generalized Inference," Journal of Quality Technology, 32(3) : 241-253, 2000.
  14. Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C.; "Gauge Capability and Designed Experiments Part 1 : Basic Methods," Quality Engineering, 6(1) : 115-135, 1993-94.
  15. Montgomery, D. C. and Runger, G. C.; "Gauge Capability and Designed Experiments Part 2 : Experimental Design Models and Variance Component Estimation," Quality Engineering, 6(2) : 289-305, 1993-94.
  16. Pan, J.-N.; "Determination of the optimal allocation of parameters for gauge repeatability and reproducibility study," The International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 21(6) : 672-682, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710410542061
  17. Pan, J.-N.; "Evaluating the Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility for Different Industries," Quality and Quantity, 40(4) : 499-518, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1100-y