DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Elementary Students' Perceptions of Science, Engineering, and Technology and on the Images of Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians

초등학생의 과학, 공학, 기술에 대한 인식 및 과학자, 공학자, 기술자에 대한 이미지 조사

  • Received : 2014.09.05
  • Accepted : 2014.12.26
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary school students' perceptions about science, engineering and technology and their images of scientists, engineers, and technicians. In order to investigate students' images of scientists, engineers, technicians and student's perception of science, engineering, and technology, we used the tools "Draw a scientist at work, Draw an engineer at work, and Draw a technician at work". We have revised the tool DAST (Draw a scientist test), which was used in Fralick et al.'s study (2009). Subjects were 209 6th grade students sampled from an elementary school in G-city in Korea. According to the results of this study, the students' representative image of a scientist was similar to stereotypical scientist image in previous studies, but the students perceived science as a field of research with various professionals. The students' representative image of an engineer was a man with short hair, no beard or mustache, wearing ordinary clothes but no glasses. The engineer was designing or constructing a ship, a robot, a computer, and an airplane. The students' representative image of a technician was a man with short hair, wearing protective goggles and a mask for welding. The technician was fixing a car, a robot, a rocket, etc. and working with wrenches, hammers, screw drivers, welding machines, etc. Many students didn't perceive engineering and technology as fields of research. Also, many students didn't variously perceive engineering and technology as fields and ways of study.

이 연구의 목적은 초등학생의 과학, 공학, 기술에 대한 인식과 과학자, 공학자, 기술자에 대한 이미지를 조사하는 데 있다. 본 연구에서는 조사도구로 Fralick et al. (2009)의 연구에서 사용된 DAST(Draw a scientist test)를 Draw a scientist at work와 Draw a engineer at work를 수정하고 변형하여 사용하였으며, 경남 G시의 S초등학교 6학년 209명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 연구 결과에 의하면, 초등학생들이 가지고 있는 과학자의 이미지는 선행연구에서 나타난 전형적인 과학자의 이미지와 비슷하였다. 공학자의 대표적인 이미지는 짧은 머리에 안경을 쓰고 있지 않으며 평상복을 입고 일을 하고 있는 형태이다. 그리고 주로 선박, 로봇, 컴퓨터, 비행기를 설계하거나 만드는 모습을 나타내었다. 기술자의 대표적인 이미지는 짧은 머리에 보호 장갑을 끼고 용접용 마스크를 착용하였다. 기술자는 자동차, 로봇 등을 고치거나 렌치, 드라이버, 용접기 등을 이용하여 일하는 모습을 나타내었다. 학생들은 공학과 기술을 학문으로 인식하지 못하는 경향을 나타냈다. 또한, 공학, 기술의 연구 분야, 연구 방법에 대해서도 다양하게 인식하지 못하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, M., & Yu, M. (2012). Comparison of career awareness, the preference for science and stereotypic image of the scientist between the gifted students and non-gifted students in elementary school. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(3), 527-550. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.3.527
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Research into STS science education. Educacion Quimica, 16(3), 384-397.
  3. Beardslee, D. C., & O'dowd, D. D. (1961). The College-Student Image of the Scientist Scientists are seen as intelligent and hard-working but also as uncultured and not interested in people. Science, 133(3457), 997-1001. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3457.997
  4. Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children's exploration of "big ideas". International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 319-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595771
  5. Cakmakci, G., Tosun, O., Turgut, S., Orenler, S., Sengul, K., & Top, G. (2011). Promoting an inclusive image of scientists among students: Towards research evidence-based practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 627-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9217-4
  6. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-ascientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
  7. Chiang, C., & Guo, C. (1996). A study of the images of the scientist for elementary school children. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
  8. Etzioni, A., & Nunn, C. (1974). The public appreciation of science in contemporary America. Daedalus, 103(3), 191-205.
  9. Farland-Smith, D. (2012). Development and Field Test of the Modified Draw-a-Scientist Test and the Draw-a-Scientist Rubric. School Science and Mathematics, 112(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00124.x
  10. Finson, K. D. (2000). Investigating preservice elementary teachers' self-efficacy relative to self-image as a science teacher. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Akron, OH.
  11. Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
  12. Finson, K. D. (2003). Applicability of the DAST-C to the images of scientists drawn by students of different racial groups. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174741
  13. Finson, K. D., Riggs, I. M., & Jesunathadas, J. (1999). The relationship of science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy to the Draw-a-Science-Teacher-Teaching Checklist. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Austin, TX.
  14. Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Crammond, R. L. (1995). Development of a field-test checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x
  15. Finson, K., Riggs, I. M., & Jesunathadas, J. (2000). The Relationship of Science Teaching Self Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy to the Draw-a-Science-Teacher-Teaching Checklist. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Austin, TX.
  16. Flick, L. (1990). Scientist in residence program improving children's image of science and scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb15536.x
  17. Fort, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26, 8-13.
  18. Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9133-3
  19. Fung, Y. (2002). A comparative study of primary and secondary school students'' images of scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514022000030453
  20. Hills, P., & Shallis, M. (1975). Scientists and their images. New Scientist, 67(964), 471-474.
  21. Huber, R. A., & Burton, C. M. (1995). What the students think scientists look like?. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 371-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15804.x
  22. Jeon, H., Yeo., S., & Woo, K. (2002) Focusing on gender differences = Effects of reading materials about scientists on the attitude toward science and images of scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(1), 22-31.
  23. Karatas, F. O., Micklos, A., & Bodner, G. M. (2011). Sixth-grade students' views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9239-2
  24. Kim, H., Choi, J., & Jung T. (2000). Impressions of the SET(Scientist-Engineer-Technician): A National Survey Analysis. Journal of Technology Innovation, 8(1), 95-123.
  25. Kim, H., Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2012). A Comparative study of middle school students' images and perceptions of scientist, technician and engineer. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(1), 64-81 https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.064
  26. Kim, J., & Cho, B. (2002). Perceptions about science and scientific activity of students in kindergarten and primary school. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 617-631.
  27. Kim, S., Jang, M., & Jeong, J. (2002). The effects of 'MEETING WITH SCIENTISTS' program on the fifth graders' physical images of scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 490-498.
  28. Kim, T., & Jang, M. (2012). Science gifted children's conceptions of a scientist's time sue. The Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 11(2), 5-23.
  29. Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students' ideas about engineers and engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
  30. Koren, P., & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils' image of 'the scientist'among two communities in Israel: A comparative study. International Journal of science education, 31(18), 2485-2509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802449375
  31. Kwon, N. (2005). Elementary school students' perceptions of scientist and socio-cultural background towards Science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education. 24(1), 59-67.
  32. Lee, C. (2012). Recent trends and dilemma of STEM education in the United States. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 25(4), 101-122.
  33. Lee, H., & Park, K. (2010). Elementary school students' images of scientists and engineers. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 16(4), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2010.16.4.61
  34. Lee, S., & No, T. (2011). The Development of instructional design model for STEM integrated approach in technology education. Korean Technology Education Association, 11(3), 1-20.
  35. Lyons, J., & Thompson, S. (2006). Investigating the long-term impact of an engineering-based GK-12 program on students' perceptions of engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.
  36. Mansour, N. (2009). Science-Technology-Society (STS): A new paradigm in science education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609336307
  37. Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., & Hunt, A. (1988). Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science & Technological Education, 6(2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514880060206
  38. MDE (2006). Massachusetts science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Massachusetts Department of Education.
  39. Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students: A pilot study. Science, 26, 284-390.
  40. Moon, D. (2008). The development of pre-Engineering educational program model based on STEM integration approach. Korean Society For Engineering Education, 11(2), 90-101.
  41. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education : Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  42. Newton, D., & Newton, L. (1992).Young children''s perceptions of science and the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140309
  43. Oware, E. A. (2008). Examining elementary students' perceptions of engineers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
  44. Oware, E., Capobianco, B., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2007). Gifted students' perceptions of engineers? A study of students in a summer outreach program. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
  45. Park, J., Sim, G., & Yuk, G. (2001). An investigation about science sifted student's perception of the science and scientist. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 11(3), 85-97.
  46. Rampal, A. (1992). Images of science a studv of school and scientists: Teachers' views. i. characteristics of scientists. Science Education, 76(4), 415-436. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760406
  47. Rubin, E., & Cohen, A. (2003). The images of scientists and science among Hebrew and Arabic-speaking pre-service teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 821-846 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305028
  48. Schibeci, R. A. (1986). Images of science and scientists and science education. Science Education, 70(2), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730700208
  49. Schibeci, R. A., & Sorensen, I. (1983). Elementary school children's perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1983.tb10087.x
  50. She, H. C. (1998). Gender and grade level differences in Taiwan students' stereotypes of science and scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514980160203
  51. Song, J. W., & Kim, K. S. (1999). How korean students see scientists: the images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290255
  52. Song, J., Pak, S., & Jang, K. (1992). Attitudes of boys and girls in elementary and secondary schools towards science lessons and scientists. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 12, 109-118.
  53. Steinke, J., Lapinski, M. K., Crocker, N., Zietsman-Thomas, A., Williams, Y., Evergreen, S. H., & Kuchibhotla, S. (2007). Assessing media influences on middle school-aged children's perceptions of women in science using the draw-a-scientist test (DAST). Science Communication, 29(1), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007306508
  54. Turkmen, H. (2008). Turkish primary students' perceptions about scientist and what factors affecting the image of the scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 55-61 https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75306
  55. Thompson, S., & Pelt, J. (2005). Measuring the influence of engineer and elementary science teacher collaborations using the draw an engineer instrument. In Proceedings of the association for the education of teachers of science annual conference, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
  56. Williams, A. (1990). Children's Pictures of scientists. Paper presented at a conference on Publics and Policies for Science. Science Museum, London.
  57. J. Solomon (1993). Teaching Science, Technology and Society, Buckingham, U.K: Open University Press.
  58. Yakman, G. (2008). ST${\Sigma}$@ M Education: an overview of creating a modelof integrative education. Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology 2006Annual Proceedings, 341-342.
  59. Yakman, G. & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Educationin the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea = Exploringthe Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical EducationalFramework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Researchin Science Education, 32(6), 1072-1086. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072
  60. Yager, R. E. (1996). Science/technology/society as reform in science education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  61. Yap, C., Ebert, C., & Lyons, J. (2003). Assessing students' perception of the engineering profession. In South Carolina educators for the practical use of research annual conference, Columbia, SC.

Cited by

  1. 국내 초·중등 공학 교육 연구 동향 분석 vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2015.18.4.45
  2. 고등학생을 위한 시스템 사고 기반의 융합인재교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용 효과 vol.35, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.6.1007
  3. Analyses of the Elementary School Students’ Activities on Topic of ‘Functions of Plant Root’ applying Behavioral Domain-centered Brain-based Evolutionary Approach vol.44, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.1.167
  4. 학교와 과학영재교육원에서의 과학영재들의 대인관계역량 분석 vol.37, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0383
  5. PRIMARY STUDENTS' STEREOTYPIC IMAGE OF INVENTOR IN KOREA vol.17, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.252
  6. 과학자들의 일상과 연구과정을 다룬 다큐멘터리를 통한 대학생들의 과학 및 과학자에 대한 인식변화 탐색 vol.38, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.2.293
  7. 중등 예비 과학교사들의 과학자 이미지 및 과학 관련 직업에 대한 인식 vol.38, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.5.753
  8. 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 과학과 서책형교과서와 디지털교과서의 삽화에 나타난 성역할 고정관념 실태 분석 vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.1.1
  9. 초등 저학년 학생들에게 과학 경험은 충분할까? - 초등 저학년 학생의 과학에 대한 인식과 과학 경험에 대한 사례 연구 - vol.39, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.4.475