DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sampled-Data Observer-Based Decentralized Fuzzy Control for Nonlinear Large-Scale Systems

  • Koo, Geun Bum (Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Jin Bae (Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Joo, Young Hoon (Dept. of Control and Robotics Engineering, Kunsan National University)
  • Received : 2014.11.18
  • Accepted : 2015.11.03
  • Published : 2016.05.01

Abstract

In this paper, a sampled-data observer-based decentralized fuzzy control technique is proposed for a class of nonlinear large-scale systems, which can be represented to a Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system. The premise variable is assumed to be measurable for the design of the observer-based fuzzy controller, and the closed-loop system is obtained. Based on an exact discretized model of the closed-loop system, the stability condition is derived for the closed-loop system. Also, the stability condition is converted into the linear matrix inequality (LMI) format. Finally, an example is provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed techniques.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Recently, as network-based systems are more increased in many engineering applications, such as wireless sensor networks, smart spaces and wide-area power systems, large-scale sampled-data systems, which well-represent characteristics of a network-based system, have attracted much attention [1, 2]. First, in the case of the large-scale system, due to the interconnection among subsystems, various problems are encountered, such as the high dimensionality and the structure constraint of the controller. To control a large-scale system, the decentralized control technique is more suitable than the traditional centralized control one. Thus, many decentralized control techniques have been proposed [3-7]; the decentralized fuzzy control technique [12-15] using a Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy model has been recognized as one of the predominant decentralized control methods.

Apart from the large-scale system issue, the sampled-data control system has both a continuous-time plant and a discrete-time controller. In the case of linear systems, because the exact discretization of the continuous-time plant is possible, the sampled-data controller design is not difficult. However, in the case of nonlinear systems, the exact discretization is not possible, and so, to overcome this problem, various nonlinear sampled-data control techniques have been proposed, such as the Euler approximation [8, 9] and the conversion to an input delay controller [10, 11]. Sampled-data fuzzy control techniques, which are combination of the sampled-data control technique and the T-S fuzzy model, have also been proposed in many studies [16-27] and are categorized into the input delay conversion approach and the direct discrete-time design approach.

First, the input delay conversion approach is to convert a sampled-data fuzzy controller into a continuous-time fuzzy one with the input time delay. This approach has been used in many studies [16-19], with such methods as H∞ control [18] and robust control [19]. However, there are few studies about observer-based control or decentralized control in the input delay conversion approach. The direct discrete-time design approach [20-27] is to guarantee stability using the discretized model of the continuous-time plant. In [20-22], various sampled-data fuzzy control techniques using the direct discrete-time design approach have been proposed, such as the observer-based output-feedback scheme [20] and the robust control [21]. However, these studies did not address the problem of discretized errors. To conquer this problem, the analysis of the stability of the discrete-time model considering the discretized error and the limitation analysis of stability for the approximately discretized model have been studied in [23, 24]. In [25], by using the exact discretized model, a sampled-data fuzzy controller was designed for stabilization of the nonlinear system. The methodology of [25] was extended to the observer-based output-feedback scheme [26] and the guaranteed cost control technique [27], but the sampled-data decentralized fuzzy control problem has not been studied yet. Thus, there still remain sampled-data fuzzy control issues for the decentralized and the observer-based output-feedback approaches.

Motivated by the aforementioned analysis, this paper presents the sampled-data observer-based decentralized fuzzy control technique for a nonlinear large-scale system. Using the T-S fuzzy model, the nonlinear large-scale system is represented as a fuzzy large-scale system, and the observer-based controller is assumed to have the measurable premise variable. Based on the exact discretized model and the discrete-time Lyapunov functional, the sufficient condition of the stabilization is investigated for closed-loop system. Also, the stability condition is converted into linear matrix inequality (LMI) formats [32-36]. Finally, by the example, the validity of the proposed ideas, techniques, and procedures is shown.

Notation: The subscripts i and j denote the fuzzy rule indices and the subscripts k and l denote the subsystem indices. The notation (⋅)T and ∗ are used for the transpose of the argument and the transposed element in symmetric positions, respectively. The notation means .

 

2. Preliminaries

Consider a T-S fuzzy large-scale system consisting of q subsystems. Then, the i th IF-THEN rule of the k th subsystem is represented by the following form:

where zkm , m∈ Ip is the premise variable; is the state variable; is the control input variable; is the sampled-data output variable to be determined in the time interval t ∈ [nT, nT + T ), , (i, m, k) ∈ Ir × Ip × Iq, is a fuzzy set for , and denote nominal system matrices with appropriate dimensions for the i th rule of the k th subsystem; and is the interconnection matrix between the k th and the l th subsystems.

By applying the center-average defuzzification, product inference, and singleton fuzzifier into the fuzzy IF-THEN rule (1), the k th subsystem of the nonlinear large-scale system can be inferred as follows:

where

in which is the fuzzy membership grade of zkm in .

Assumption 1: The state variable xk(t) is not measurable, but the premise variable zk(t) is measurable in the continuous-time sense and the output variable yk(t) is measurable only at sampling instants.

Depending on Assumption 1, we consider the following sampled-data observer-based decentralized fuzzy controller:

where is the state variable by the fuzzy observer, respectively; is the observer output; and and denote the control and observer gains.

To represent the closed-loop system with the sampled-data observer-based decentralized fuzzy controller, we suppose the estimation error . Then, substituting (3) into (2) and the time derivative of ek(t), the k th sub-closed-loop system can be established as follows:

where

From the k th sub-closed-loop system (4), the observer-based decentralized fuzzy control problem can be stated as follows:

Problem 1: Find the fuzzy observer and control gain matrices and stabilizing the whole closed-loop large-scale system, which are respectively composed of sub-closed-loop systems with the sampled-data observer-based decentralized fuzzy controller.

 

3. Main Results

Before proceeding to the main results, the following lemmas and propositions will be needed throughout the proof:

Lemma 1 [28]: Given any function vector x , matrix and t0, tf ∈ ℝ with t0 < tf , we have

Lemma 2 [27]: Suppose the nonlinear system such as , where f :[nT, nT + T) × ℝn is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x and the matrix , then the following inequality is always satisfied

Lemma 3 [29]: Given any matrices Y and , we have

−YT P−1 Y ≤ P − YT − Y .

Proposition 1: In the closed-loop system (4), there exists some constant ρ > 0 such that

for t ∈ [nT, nT + T).

Proof: From the closed-loop system (4), we have

Integrating from nT to t, taking the norm and summing all subsystems on both sides of equation (6) yields

where

and Iq × Iw denotes all pairs (k, i) ∈ Iq × Iq such that k ≠ l.

By , inequality (7) can be further developed as follows:

Then, an application of the Gronwall-Bellman inequality to results in

Remark 1: Proposition 1 shows the relation between and for the closed-loop system (4). By Proposition 1, we know that each state variable xk(t) converges to the origin when the whole xk(nT) converges to the origin.

The sufficient condition for stability of the closed-loop system (4) is summarized as the following proposition:

Proposition 2: If there exist some symmetric and positive definite matrices , , and some matrices , such that the following inequality is satisfied, then the whole closed-loop system which is composed of sub-closed-loop systems (4) is asymptotically stable.

where, , Ψk(t) = T−1 I + Φk(t), ω = (q − 1)−1 for t ∈ [nT, nT + T).

Proof: By integrating the closed-loop system (4) from nT to nT + T , we have the exact discretized model as follows:

Based on the discretized model (9), we consider the discrete-time Lyapunov function candidate as follows:

where , then the first forward difference of V can be defined by

Substituting (9) into (10) yields

By applying Lemma 1 and 2, equation (11) becomes

where .

For the positive definite matrices and , the followings are satisfied

By applying (13) and (14) to (12), we have

where

Thus, from inequality (15), if the following inequality is satisfied

then the ΔV is less than 0 .

By using the Schur complement in (16), we can obtain inequality (8). Thus, if inequality (8) is satisfied, the equilibrium point xk(nT) = 0 of all discretized sub-closed-loop systems (9) is asymptotically stable. Also, by Proposition 1, the equilibrium point xk(t) = 0 of all sub-closed-loop systems (4) is also asymptotically stable.

By Proposition 2, we have the stabilization condition of the nonlinear large-scale system (2) with the sampled-data observer-based decentralized fuzzy controller. However, it is difficult to directly solve inequality (8) and obtain the gain matrices and . Thus, to convert into LMI format, which is easily solved by a convex optimization toolbox, we respectively define the matrices and without the loss of generality as follows:

where αk > 0 is a given constant scalar.

Based on the newly defined matrices , and Proposition 2, we summarize the LMI condition satisfying inequality (8).

Theorem 1: If there exist some symmetric and positive matrices , , , , some symmetric matrices , , , and some matrices , , such that the following LMIs are satisfied, then inequality (8) is also satisfied and the whole closed-loop system (4) is asymptotically stable.

where

and αk > 0 , βk > 0 , γk1 > 0 and γk2 > 0 are given constant scalars.

Proof: By substituting (17) and (18) into inequality (8), we obtain

where

If there exist symmetric matrices , and such that the following inequality is satisfied:

Then, inequality (21) is majorized by

where

By using the congruence transformation with diag, applying the Schur complement and denoting , , , , inequality (23) can be represented as

Also, by using the Schur complement, applying Lemma 3 and denoting , inequality (22) can be converted into LMI (20). Thus, if LMIs (19) and (20) are satisfied, inequality (8) of Proposition 2 is also satisfied, and the whole closed-loop system (4) is asymptotically stable.

Remark 2: In Theorems 1, we assume that the parameters αk , βk , γ1k and γ2k are given in advance. However, when these parameters are unknown, the parameter value must first be determined. In this case, the iterative LMI (ILMI), which is minutely described in [12], has to be used.

 

4. An illustrative example

In this section, an example is given to validate the proposed sampled-data observer-based decentralized fuzzy control method. Suppose the double Chua's circuit system [30, 31] connected by a resistor as follows:

where { (k, l) ∈ I2 | k ≠ l} ; vk1(t) , vk2(t) and ik(t) are state variables of the k th Chua's circuit; Rk is a resistor with R1 = 100mΩ and R2 = 125mΩ ; Ck1 and Ck2 are capacitors with Ck1 = 1F and Ck2 = 10F ; Lk is an inductor with L1 = 70mH and L2 = 75mH ; σk1 and σk2 are input coefficients with σ11 = 10 , σ12 = 10 , σ21 = 0.07 and σ22 = 0.075 ; Ra = 3Ω is an interconnected resistor between circuits; and fk (vk1 (t)) = (gb/Rk)vk1 (t) + ((ga − gb)/2Rk)(|vk1 (t) + | − |vk1 (t) − 1|) is a Chua's diode with ga = −1.27 and gb = −0.68 .

By choosing xk (t) = [vk1 (t) vk2 (t) ik (t)]T and uk (t) = [uk1 (t) uk2 (t) uk3 (t)]T, the T-S fuzzy system of the k th subsystem can be constructed as follows:

where

with the parameters λ11 =10 , λ12 =14.2857 , λ21 = 8 , λ22 =13.3333 , λ31 = λ32 = 0.3333 and d =1.8 for (i, k, l) ∈ I2 × I2 × I2 with k ≠ l. In this simulation model, the premise variable xk1 (t) can be directly obtained by the output variable.

Based on the above control and observer gains, we obtain the closed-loop large-scale systems and present the time responses of the state variables and estimated errors for each subsystem. The time responses are shown in Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. As shown in the figures, all state variables and errors are converted to 0, and it means that the obtained gains are suitable to stabilize the double Chua’s circuit system. Thus, we know that the proposed sampleddata observer-based decentralized fuzzy control technique is suitable for a nonlinear large-scale system.

Fig. 1.The time response of large-scale system: subsystem 1 (solid) and subsystem 2 (dash-dotted).

Fig. 2.The time response of subsystem 1 for T = 0.02 s: x11 (t) (solid), x12 (t) (dotted) and x13 (t) (dashed).

Fig. 3.The time response of subsystem 2 for T = 0.02 s: x21 (t) (solid), x22 (t) (dotted) and x23 (t) (dashed).

Fig. 4.The estimated error of subsystem 1 for T = 0.02 s: e11 (t) (solid), e12 (t) (dotted) and e13 (t) (dashed).

Fig. 5.The estimated error of subsystem 2 for T = 0.02 s: e21 (t) (solid), e22 (t) (dotted) and e23 (t) (dashed).

 

5. Conclusions

This paper has established a sampled-data observer-based decentralized fuzzy controller for nonlinear large-scale systems. Based on the T-S fuzzy system, the closed-loop systems have been represented. The sufficient condition has been derived for the stability of the closed-loop system by using the exact discretized model and the discrete-time Lyapunov functional and was formulated in the LMI formats. Finally, the numerical example was provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed techniques.

References

  1. M. Jamshidi, Large-Scale System: Modeling and Control: Elesevier, 1983.
  2. T. Chen and B. A. Francis, Optimal Sampled-Data Control Systems: Springer, 1995.
  3. L. Bakule, “Decentralized control: an overview,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 32, pp. 87-98, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2008.03.004
  4. S. S. Stanković, D. M. Stipanović, and D. D. Šiljak, “Decentralized dynamic output feedback for robust stabilization of a class of nonlinear interconnected systems,” Automatica, vol. 43, pp. 861-867, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2006.11.010
  5. S. S. Stanković and D. D. Šiljak, “Robust stabilization of nonlinear interconnected systems by decentralized dynamic output feedback,” Syst. Control Lett., vol. 58, pp. 271-275, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2008.11.003
  6. S. Tong, C. Liu, and Y. Li, “Fuzzy-adaptive decentralized output-feedback control for large-scale nonlinear systems with dynamical uncertainties,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 845-861, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2010.2050326
  7. S. Ganapathy and S. Velusami, “Decentralized load-frequency control of interconnected power systems with SMES units and governor dead band using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm,” J. Electr. Eng. & Technol. vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 443-450, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2009.4.4.443
  8. D. Nešić and A. R. Teel, “Stabilization of sampled-data nonlinear systems via backstepping on their Euler approximate model,” Automatica, vol. 42, pp. 1801-1808, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2006.05.015
  9. Z. Mao, B. Jiang, and P. Shi, “Fault-tolerant control for a class of nonlinear sampled-data systems via a Euler approximate observer,” Automatica, vol. 46, pp. 1852-1859, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2010.06.052
  10. E. Fridman, U. Shaked, and V. Suplin, “Input/output delay approach to robust sampled-data H control,” Syst. Control Lett., vol.54, pp.271-282, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2004.08.012
  11. E. Fridman, “A refined input delay approach to sampled-data control,” Automatica, vol.46, pp.421-427, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.11.017
  12. C.-S. Tseng, “A novel approach to H de-centralized fuzzy-observer-based fuzzy control design for non-linear interconnected systems,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1337-1350, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.924355
  13. F.-H. Hsiao, J.-D. Hwang, C.-W. Chen, and Z.-R. Tsai, “Robust stabilization of nonlinear multiple time-delay large-scale systems via decentralized fuzzy control,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 152-163, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2004.836067
  14. C. Hua and S. X. Ding, “Decentralized networked control system design using T-S fuzzy approach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 9-21, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2162735
  15. G. B. Koo, J. B. Park, and Y. H. Joo, “Decentralized fuzzy observer-based output-feedback control for nonlinear large-scale systems: an LMI approach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 406-419, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2259497
  16. H. K. Lam and H. F. Leung, “Sampled-data fuzzy controller for time-delay nonlinear systems: fuzzymodel-based LMI approach,” IEEE Trans. Syst, Man, Cybern. B, Cybern., vol.37, no.3, pp.617-629, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2006.889629
  17. H. K. Lam and L. D. Seneviratne, “Chaotic synchronization using sampled-data fuzzy controller based on fuzzy-model-based approach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 883-892, 2008.
  18. D. H. Lee, J. B. Park, Y. H. Joo, and S. K. Kim, “Local H∞ Controller Design for Continuous-time TS Fuzzy Systems”, Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 1499-1507, 2015, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-014-0439-z
  19. J. Yoneyama, “Robust sampled-data stabilization of uncertain fuzzy systems via input delay approach,” Inform. Sciences, vol. 198, pp. 169-176, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.02.007
  20. H. J. Lee, J. B. Park, and Y. H. Joo, “Digitalizing a fuzzy observer-based output-feedback control: intelligent digital redesign approach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 701-716, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2005.856556
  21. H.C. Sung, D.W. Kim, J.B. Park, and Y.H. Joo, “Robust digital control of fuzzy systems with parametric uncertainties: LMI-based digital redesign approach,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 161, pp. 919-933, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2009.04.016
  22. G. B. Koo, J. B. Park, and Y. H. Joo, “Intelligent digital redesign for nonlinear interconnected systems using decentralized fuzzy control,” J. Electr. Eng. & Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 420-428, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2012.7.3.420
  23. D. W. Kim, J. B. Park, and Y. H. Joo, “Theoretical justification of approximate norm minimization method for intelligent digital redesign,” Automatica, vol. 44, pp. 851-856, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2007.07.003
  24. H. J. Lee and D. W. Kim, “Intelligent digital revisited: approximate discretization and stability limitation,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol.159, pp.3221-3231, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.05.023
  25. D. W. Kim, H. J. Lee, and M. Tomizuka, “Fuzzy stabilization of nonlinear systems under sampled-data feedback: an exact discrete-time model approach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 251-260, 2010.
  26. D. W. Kim and H. J. Lee, “Sampled-data observer-based output-feedback fuzzy stabilization of nonlinear systems: exact discrete-time design approach,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 201, pp. 20-39, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.12.017
  27. G. B. Koo, J. B. Park, and Y. H. Joo, “Guaranteed cost sampled-data fuzzy control for non-linear systems: a continuous-time Lyapunov approach,” IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1745-1752, 2013.
  28. K. Gu, “An integral in the stability problem of time-delay systems,” in Proceedings of 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, December 2000.
  29. J. V. D. Oliveira, J. Bernussou, and J. C. Geromel, “A new discrete-time robust stability condition,” Syst. Control Lett., vol. 37, pp. 261-265, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6911(99)00035-3
  30. Y. Zheng and G. Chen, “Fuzzy impulsive control of chaotic based on TS fuzzy model,” Chaos, Solitons Fractals, vol. 39, pp. 2002-2011, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.061
  31. W.-S. Yu and T.-S. Wu, “Fuzzy adaptive observer-based control for Chua’s circuit with output time delay,” IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 303-320, 2011.
  32. H. C. Sung, J. B. Park, “Observe-based sampled-data control for uncertain nonlinear systems: intelligent digital redesign approach,” Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 486-496, 2014, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-013-0129-2
  33. D. H. Lee, Y. H. Joo, and S. K. Kim, “H Digital Redesign for LTI Systems”, Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 603-610, 2015, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-014-0326-7
  34. D. H. Lee, Y. H. Joo, and M. H. Tak, “LMI Conditions for Local Stability and Stabilization of Continuous-Time T-S Fuzzy Systems”, Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 986-994, 2015, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-014-0327-6
  35. D. H. Lee and Y. H. Joo, “LMI-based Robust Sampled-data Stabilization of Polytopic LTI Systems: A Truncated Power Series Expansion Approach”, Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., vol., 3, no. 2, pp. 284-291, 2015, 4.
  36. D. H. Lee, Y. H. Joo, and S. K. Kim, “FIR-type Robust H2 and H Control of Discrete Linear Time-invariant Polytopic Systems via Memory State-feedback Control Laws”, Int. J. Control, Autom. Syst., Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 1047-1056, 2015, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-014-0431-7

Cited by

  1. Linear Matrix Inequality Robust Tracking Control Conditions for Nonlinear Disturbed Interconnected Systems vol.139, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035404