DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Suggested Air Sampling Strategy for Bioaerosols in Daycare Center Settings

어린이활동공간에서의 바이오에어로졸 포집 전략

  • Jo, JungHeum (The Environmental Health Center for Asthma, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Jun-sik (The Environmental Health Center for Asthma, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Yeon (Environmental Infrastructure Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kwon, Myung hee (Environmental Infrastructure Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Ki Youn (Department of Industrial Health, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Choi, Jeong-Hak (Department of Environmental Engineering, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Seo, SungChul (The Environmental Health Center for Asthma, Korea University Medical Center)
  • 조정흠 (고려대학교 안암병원 환경보건센터) ;
  • 박준식 (고려대학교 안암병원 환경보건센터) ;
  • 김성연 (국립환경과학원 생활환경연구과) ;
  • 권명희 (국립환경과학원 생활환경연구과) ;
  • 김기연 (부산가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 최정학 (부산가톨릭대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 서성철 (고려대학교 안암병원 환경보건센터)
  • Received : 2016.08.01
  • Accepted : 2016.09.23
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to compare the sampling performance of different flow-based impactor samplers for collecting fungal spores and bacteria and to explore the association of the level of bioaerosols with activity patterns of occupants in daycare center settings. Methods: For comparison of sampling performance, two different flow-based samplers (greater than 100 L/min or not) were selected; a low flow-based sampler (one-stage Andersen sampler) and two high flow-based samplers (DUO SAS SUPER 360 sampler, BUCK bio-culture sampler). We collected airborne mold and bacteria in 30 daycare centers with various levels of contaminated air. Three repeat samplings per each sampler were performed. Mold and bacteria were grown for 96 hours at $25{\pm}1^{\circ}C$ and 48 hours at $35{\pm}1^{\circ}C$, respectively. The Andersen and SAS samplers were used for investigating the association between the level of bioaerosols and the activity patterns of occupants in daycares. Particular matters 10($PM_{10}$), temperature, and relative humidity were monitored as well. Samplings were carried out with one-hour interval from 9 to 5 O'clock. For statistical comparisons, Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon's signed rank test, and multiple regression analysis were carried out. Results: The airborne level of molds by the low flow-based sampler were significantly higher than that of high flow-based samplers (indoor, P=0.037; outdoor, P=0.041). However, no statistical difference was observed in the airborne level of bacteria by each sampler. Also the level of bioaerosols varied by the time, particularly with different activity patterns in daycare centers. The higher level of mold and bacteria were observed in play time in indoor. Similarly, the concentrations of $PM_{10}$ were significantly associated with the level of bioaerosols (P<0.05). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the flow rate of sampler, rather than total air volume, could be able to affect the results of sampling. Also, the level of airborne mold and bacteria vary behavior patterns of occupants in indoor of daycare settings. Therefore, different samplers with other flow rate may be selected for mold or bacteria sampling, and activity patterns should be considered for bioaerosol sampling as well.

Keywords

References

  1. Boudia N, Halley R, Kennedy G, Lambert J, Gareau L, et al. Manganese concentrations in the air of the Montreal(Canada) subway in relation to surface automobile traffic density. Science of The Total Environment 2006;366(1):143-147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.094
  2. Cho JH, Paik NW. Assessment of airborne fungi concentrations in subway stations in Seoul. Korea Journal of Environmental Health Sciences 2009;35(6): 487-494
  3. Didier N, Jacques L, Adel B, Muriel B, Jacques C, et al. Comparative performance of impactor air samplers for quantification of fungal contamination. Journal of Hospital Infection 2001;47:149-155 https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2000.0883
  4. Griffiths WD, DeCosemo GAL. The assessment of bioaerosols: A critical review. Aerosol Science and Technology 1994;25(8):1425-1458 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(94)90218-6
  5. Hinds WC. Aerosol technology: properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1998. p. 394-396
  6. Institute of Medicine(IOM). Damp Indoor Spaces and Health. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.; 2004. p. 189-201
  7. International Organization for Standardization(ISO). ISO 16000-18:Indoor air-Detection and enumeration of moulds-Sampling by impaction.; 2011. p. 1-20
  8. James P, Lodge JR. Methods of Air Sampling and Analysis. Lewis Publishers, New York.; 1989. p. 28-29
  9. Kideso J, Wrtz H, Nielsen KF, Kruse P, Wilkins K, et al. Determination of fungal spore release from wet building materials. Journal of Indoor Air 2003;13:148-155 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2003.00172.x
  10. Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology (KAAACI), Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Diseases (KAPARD), National Strategic Coordinating Center of Clinical Research (NSCR), Korean Guideline for Asthma.; 2015. p. 11-14
  11. Marta SM, Maria MV, Guillermo C, Raquel P, Ricardo A, et al. Comparison of three high-flow single-stage impaction-based air samplers for bacteria quantification: DUO SAS SUPER 360, SAMPL'AIR and SPIN AIR. Journal of Anal Methods 2012;4:399-405 https://doi.org/10.1039/C1AY05562C
  12. Park JY, Kim SY. Study of Correlation between Bioaerosol and Indoor Environmental Factors in Elementary School Classroom. Journal of the Korean Society of Architectural Institute Conference 2007;27(1):829-832
  13. Park JH. Exposure assessment of biological agents in indoor environments. Korean Journal of Environmental Health Sciences 2009;35(4):239-248 https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2009.35.4.239
  14. Roh YM, Kim JC, Lee CM, Kim YS, Ha MN, et al. A Survey of Distribution for Indoor Air Pollutants in Classrooms of Some Elementary Schools, Journal of Odor and Indoor Environment 2007;4(4):204-213
  15. Sahakian NM, qkrehd JH, Cox-Ganser JM. Dampness and mold in the indoor environment: implications for asthma. Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America 2008;28:485-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2008.03.009
  16. Salvi S. Health effects of ambient air pollution in children. Pediatric Respiratory Reviews 2007; 8(4):275-280 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2007.08.008
  17. Stolwijk JA. Risk assessment of acute health and comfort effects of indoor air pollution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1992;641:56-62 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb16532.x
  18. World Health Organization (WHO), Guidelines for indoor air quality: Dampness and mould. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen Denmark.; 2009. p. 65-75