DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사회불안장애의 해석편향 연구: 컴퓨터 기반 해석편향 프로그램 개발 및 효과검증

Interpretation bias modification for social anxiety disorder: Development of computer based cognitive modification program

  • 투고 : 2017.03.09
  • 심사 : 2017.04.20
  • 발행 : 2017.04.28

초록

본 연구에서는 컴퓨터 기반의 인지편향수정 프로그램(Cognitive Bias Modification Program - Interpretation, CBM-I)을 이용하여 사회불안 경향이 있는 대학생들을 위한 해석편향 수정 프로그램을 개발하고, 이 프로그램이 사회불안증상 및 해석편향 변화에 미치는 효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 40명의 사회불안 경향성자들을 긍정해석 훈련집단((n=21)과 비처치대기집단((n=19)에 배정하였고 치료 전후 해석 편향과 사회불안증상 수준(e.g. 부정적 평가에 대한 두려움 척도, 레보위츠 사회불안 척도)을 비교하였다. CBM-I 훈련은 참가자들이 긍정적인 방식으로 모호한 상황을 해석하면 긍정적 피드백을 제공하고, 부정적인 방식으로 해석하면 부정적 피드백을 제공하는 방식으로 진행되었으며, 긍정해석 훈련집단의 경우 3주간 3번의 회기에 참가하였다. 사후분석에서 긍정훈련 조건에 참가한 내담자들의 자기 보고식 사회불안 증상이 감소하였다(t=2.35, p<.05; t=4.70, p<.001). 이러한 결과는 다중회기로 실시된 해석 편향의 수정이 임상적으로 유용할 수 있음을 시사한다.

The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-based cognitive bias modification program (CBM-I) and to test the efficacy of CBM-I for college students with social anxiety. Forty socially anxious individuals were randomly assigned to the CBM-I(n=21) or a waiting list condition(n=19). Both groups were assessed at the beginning and the end of the program with interpretation bias and social anxiety symptoms(e.g. B=FNE=Brief-Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, LSAS=Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale). The CBM-I modified interpretation by providing positive feedback when participants made benign interpretations and negative feedback in response to threat interpretations. Participants in CBM-I completed three computer sessions over three weeks. The CBM-I successfully decreased social anxiety symptoms compared to the control condition(t=2.35, p<.05; t=4.70, p<.001). This result suggests that interpretation modification may have clinical utility when applied as a multi-session intervention.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. D. Huppert, E. B. Foa, J. M. Furr, J. C. Filip, D. Mathews, “A Interpretation Bias in Social Anxiety: A Dimensional Perspective,” Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 569-577, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026359105456
  2. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5(R)), American Psychiatric Pub, 2013.
  3. C. Beard, N. Amir, “A multi-session interpretation modification program: changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 1135-1141, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.012
  4. M. J. Voncken, S. M. Bogel, K. de Vries, “Interpretation and judgmental biases in social phobia,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 1481-1488, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00143-8
  5. C. R. Hirsch, A. Mathews, “Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia,” J. of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 705-712, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.705
  6. N. Amir, E. B. Foa, M. E. Coles, “Automatic activation and strategic avoidance of threat-relevant information in social phobia,” J. of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 285-290, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.107.2.285
  7. N. Amir, C. Beard, E. Bower, “Interpretation Bias and Social Anxiety,” Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 433-443, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-2834-5
  8. J. Canton, K. M. Scott, P. Glue, “Optimal treatment of social phobia: systematic review and meta-analysis,” J. of Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 203-215, 2012.
  9. H. Y. Yoon, J. H. Kwon, “The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Changes in the Attentional Bias and the Implicit Self-Esteem,” Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 211-234, 2013.
  10. N. Amir, J. Bomyea, C. Beard, “The Effect of Single-Session Interpretation Modification on Attention Bias in Socially Anxious Individuals,” J. of Anxiety Disorder, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 178-182, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.10.005
  11. A. Mathews, B. Mackintosh, “Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety,” J. of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 602-615, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.602
  12. C. Lothmann, E. A. Holmes, S. W. Chan, J. Y. Lau, “Cognitive bias modification training in adolescents: effects on interpretation biases and mood,” J. of Children Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 24-32, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02286.x
  13. S. Mobini, B. Mackintosh, J. Illingworth, L. Gega, P. Langdon, L. Hoppitt, “Effects of standard and explicit cognitive bias modification and computer-administered cognitive-behaviour therapy on cognitive biases and social anxiety,” J. of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 272-279, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.12.002
  14. H. J. Kwon, The effect of interpretation bias modificationonself-evaluation and post-event rumination for socially anxious individuals, MA. dissertation, Ajou University, 2014.
  15. R. Murphy, C. R. Hirsch, A. Mathews, K. Smith, D. M. Clark, “Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population,” Behavior Research and Therapy, Vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 1517-1529, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.01.007
  16. E. Wilson, C. MacLeod, A. Mathews, E. Rutherford, “The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety reactivity,” J. of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 103-111, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.103
  17. E. Salemink, M. van den Hout, M. Kindt, “Trained interpretive bias: Validity and effects on anxiety,” J. of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 212-224, 2007a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.010
  18. A. Mathews, V. Ridgeway, E. Cook, J. Yiend, “Inducing a benign interpretational bias reduces trait anxiety,” J. of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 225-236, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.011
  19. E. Salemink, M. van den Hout, M. Kindt, "Trained interpretive bias and anxiety," Behavior Research and Therapy, Vol. 45, No. 2,pp. 329-340, 2007b. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.011
  20. S. P. Vassilopoulos, R. Banerjee, C. Prantzalou, “Experimental modification of interpretation bias in socially anxious children: Changes in interpretation, anticipated interpersonal anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 1085-1089, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.018
  21. J. Y. Lee, J. H. Choi, “A Study of the Reliability and the Validity of the Korean versions of Social Phobia Scales (K-SAD, K-FNE),” The Korean Journal of Psychology: Clinical, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 251-264, 1997.
  22. G. G. Jeon, S. J. Choi, B. C. Yang, “Integrated Adaptation of CES-D in Korea,” The Korean Journal of Psychology: Healthy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 59-76, 2001.
  23. E. S. Yoo, C. I. Ahn, K. H. Park, “Factor Structure and Diagnostic Efficiency of A Korean Version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale,” The Korean Journal of Psychology: Clinical, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 251-270, 2007. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2007.26.1.015
  24. Y. Hakamata, S. Lissek, Y. Bar-Haim, J. C. Britton, N. A. Fox, E. Leibenluft, M. Leibenluft, Emst, D. S. Pine, “Attention bias modification treatment: a meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety,” Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 68, No. 11, pp. 982-990, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.021
  25. L. S. Hallion, A. M. Ruscio, “A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression,” Psychol Bull, Vol. 137, No. 6, pp. 940-958, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024355
  26. J. O. Bowler, L. Hoppitt, J. Illingworth, T. Dalgleish, M. Ononaiye, G. Perez-Olivas, B. Mackintosh, “Asymmetrical transfer effects of cognitive bias modification: Modifying attention to threat influences interpretation of emotional ambiguity, but not vice versa,” J. of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 239-246, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.011
  27. S. Hayes, C. R.Hirsch, G. Krebs, A. Mathews, “The effects of modifying interpretation bias on worry in generalized anxiety disorder,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 171-178, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.10.006
  28. I. A. Cristea, R. N. Kok, P. Cuijpers, "Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis," The British Journal of Psychiatry, Vo1. 206, No. 1, pp. 7-16, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761
  29. I. A. Cristea, R. N. Kok, P. Cuijpers, "Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis," The British Journal of Psychiatry, Vo1. 206, No. 1, pp. 7-16, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761
  30. B. E. Sportel, E. de Hullu, P. J. de Jong, M. H. Mauta, "Cognitive bias modification versus CBT in reducing adolescent social anxiety: a randomized controlled trial," PLoS One, Vol. 8, No. 5, e64355, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064355
  31. K. H. Kim, “A Convergence Study about Meta-Analysis on the Effects of ACT Intervention Program,” J. of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 145-153, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2016.7.5.145
  32. L. Hoppitt, J. L. Illingworth, C. MacLeod, A. Hampshire, B. D. Dunn, B. Mackintosh, “Modifying social anxiety related to a real-life stressor using online Cognitive Bias Modification for interpretation,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 45-52, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2013.10.008
  33. H. O. Kim, Y. J. Koo, E. Park, “The influence on mental health of college students by their perceived stress, stress coping, perfectionism, and self esteem,” J. of digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 257-266, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.2.257
  34. S. Y. Pi, “Educational Utilization of Smart Devices in the Convergence Education Era,” J. of digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 29-37, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.6.29