DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Supply Chain Coordination for Perishable Products under Yield and Demand Uncertainty: A Simulation Approach

수요와 수율의 불확실성을 고려한 공급망 조정

  • 김진민 (고려대학교 글로벌비즈니스대학) ;
  • 최석봉 (고려대학교 글로벌비즈니스대학)
  • Received : 2018.11.08
  • Accepted : 2018.11.30
  • Published : 2018.12.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study developed a simulation model that incorporates the uncertainty of demand and yield to obtain optimized results for supply chain coordination within environmental constraints. The objective of this study is to examine whether yield management for perishable products can achieve the goal of supply chain coordination between a single buyer and a single supplier under a variety of environmental conditions. Methods: We investigated the efficiency of a revenue-sharing contract and a wholesale price contract by considering demand and yield uncertainty, profit maximizing ratio, and success ratio. The implications for environmental variation were derived through a comparative analysis between the wholesale price contract and the revenue-sharing contract. We performed Monte Carlo simulations to give us the results of an optimized supply chain within the environments defined by the experimental factors and parameters. Results: We found that a revised revenue-sharing contracting model was more efficient than the wholesale price contract model and allowed all members of the supply chain to achieve higher profits. First, as the demand variation (${\sigma}$) increased, the profit of the total supply chain increased. Second, as the revenue-sharing ratio (${\Phi}$) increased, the profits of the manufacturer gradually decreased, while the profits of the retailer gradually increased, and this change was linear. Third, as the quality of yield increased, the profits of suppliers appear to increased. At last, success rate was expressed as the profit increased in the revenue-sharing contract compared to the profit increase in the wholesale price contract. Conclusion: The managerial implications of the simulation findings are: (1) a strategic approach to demand and yield uncertainty helps in efficient resource utilization and improved supply chain performance, (2) a revenue-sharing contract amplifies the effect of yield uncertainty, and (3) revised revenue-sharing contracts fetch more profits for both buyers and suppliers in the supply chain.

Keywords

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. The change in profit maximizing ratio for demand variation (σ) and revenue-sharing ratio (Φ) (α=0.7)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. The change in profit maximizing ratio for demand variation (σ) and yield (α) (Φ = 0.65)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Change in success rae for demand variation (σ) and revenue-sharing ratio (Φ) (α = 0.7)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Change in success rate for demand variation (σ) and yield (α) (Φ = 0.65)

Table 1. Input Parameters and Experimental Conditions

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. The change in profit maximizing ratio for demand variation (σ) and revenue-sharing ratio (Φ) (α=0.7)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. The change in profit maximizing ratio for demand variation (σ) and yield (α) (Φ = 0.65)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. The change in profit maximizing ratio for yield (α) and revenue-sharing ratio (Φ) σ = 0.2)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Change in success rae for demand variation (σ) and revenue-sharing ratio (Φ) (α = 0.7)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Change in success rate for demand variation (σ) and yield (α) (Φ = 0.65)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Change in success rate for yield (α) and revenue-sharing ratio (Φ) (σ = 0.2)

PJGOB9_2018_v46n4_959_t0007.png 이미지

References

  1. Ahumada, O., and Villalobos, J. R. 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A Review." European journal of Operational research 196(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.014
  2. Ahumada, O., and Villalobos, J. R. 2011. "Operational model for planning the harvest and distribution of perishable agricultural products." International Journal of Production Economics 133(2):677-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.015
  3. Ahumada, O., Villalobos, J. R., and Mason, A. N. 2012. "Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty." Agricultural Systems 112:17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.06.002
  4. Ai, X., Chen, J., and Ma, J. 2012. "Contracting with demand uncertainty under supply chain competition." Annals of Operations Research 201(1):17-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1227-x
  5. Baek, C. H., Son, E. I., and Lim, S. U. 2018. "Issues and Strategies for Policy and Support of 6th Industry." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 46(2):243-258. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.2.243
  6. Beske, P., and Seuring, S. 2014. "Putting sustainability into supply chain management." Supply Chain Management: an international journal 19(3):322-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0432
  7. Blackburn, J., and Scudder, G. 2009. "Supply chain strategies for perishable products: The case of fresh produce." Production and Operations Management 18(2):129-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01016.x
  8. Borodin, V., Bourtembourg, J., Hnaien, F., and Labadie, N. 2016. "Handling uncertainty in agricultural supply chain management: A state of the art." European Journal of Operational Research 254(2):348-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.057
  9. Cachon, G. P., and Lariviere, M. A. 2005. "Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations." Management Science 51(1):30-44. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0215
  10. Chong, H. R., Hong, S. H., Lee, M. K., and Kwon, H. M. 2018. "Quality Strategy in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution by Technological Evolution." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 46(3):483-496. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.3.483
  11. El Ouardighi, F., and Kim, B. 2010. "Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition." European Journal of Operational Research 206(2):329-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.035
  12. Gerchak, Y., Cho, R. K., and Ray, S. 2006. "Coordination of quantity and shelf-retention timing in the video movie rental industry." IIE Transactions 38(7):525-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170590961166
  13. Hamalainen, E., Twrdy, E., and Inkinen, T. 2017. "Cost aggregation in export logistics chain." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 3(1):1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0052-5
  14. Kazaz, B., and Webster, S. 2011. "The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty." Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 13(3):404-417. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1110.0335
  15. Kwon, H. M., and Hong, S. H. 2018. "A Future Prospect for Change in each Step of Six Sigma DMAIC under the 4th Industrial Revolution." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 46(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.1.001
  16. Lee, J. H., Khee-Su, B., Lee, J. W., In, Y., Kwon, T., and Lee, W. 2016. "Valuation method by regression analysis on real royalty-related data by using multiple input descriptors in royalty negotiations in Life Science area-focused on anticancer therapies." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0025-5
  17. Maddah, B., Salameh, M. K., and Karame, G. M. 2009. "Lot sizing with random yield and different qualities." Applied Mathematical Modelling 33(4):1997-2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.05.009
  18. Tang, S. Y., and Kouvelis, P. 2014. "Pay‐back‐revenue‐sharing contract in coordinating Supply Chains with random yield." Production and Operations Management 23(12):2089-2102. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12240
  19. Van Der Vorst, J. G., Tromp, S. O., and Zee, D. J. V. D. 2009. "Simulation modelling for food supply chain redesign; integrated decision making on product quality, sustainability and logistics." International Journal of Production Research 47(23):6611-6631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802356747
  20. Wang, C. X. 2002. "A general framework of supply chain contract models." Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 7(5):302-310. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540210447746
  21. Wells, J. H., and Singh, R. P. 1989. "A quality‐based inventory issue policy for perishable foods." Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 12(4):271-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.1989.tb00086.x
  22. Yoon, S., and Jeong, S. 2017. "Effects to implement the open-innovation coordinative strategies between manufacturer and retailer in reverse supply chain." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 3(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0052-5