Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology (한국응용과학기술학회지)

The Korean Society of Applied Science and Technology (한국응용과학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Current Status of Health Screening and the Health Type(Physical Activity, and etc) of the Disabled by Using the Statistics of Health Insurance Corporation

건강보험공단 통계를 이용한 장애인의 건강검진 현황 및 건강형태(신체활동 등)에 대한 소고

  • 김석진 (건국대학교 체육학과) ;
  • 정진성 (대전대학교 스포츠과학부)
  • Received : 2018.05.31
  • Accepted : 2018.06.27
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to examine the screening rate of health screening of the disabled by screening the data of disability and health statistics of the National Health Insurance Corporation, to suggest the problems of health examination and the future improvement measures, and also to review the type of health management of the disabled based on the results of health examination interview. As people with limited daily life or social life for a long time because of their physical/psychological disabilities in accordance with the Article2 of , out of 2,479,080 registered people with disabilities on the basis of December 31st 2015, the research subjects were limited to people with disabilities who participated in the health screening and health type for presenting the opinions about policies. In conclusion, regarding the health screening for the disabled, first, it would be necessary to collect the opinions from people with disabilities in order to prepare the health screening service suitable for them. Second, it would be needed to develop the health screening items for each type of disability and severity. Third, it would be necessary to consider the medical equipments and amenities of health examination for the disabled. Fourth, there should be the securement of manpower and education for service providers. Fifth, the mobility right of the disabled should be secured. Regarding the health type of the disabled, first, the expert consultative group in each area should be composed for the health enhancement of the disabled. Second, it would be necessary to screening the current status of health enhancement programs for the disabled and operating facilities. Third, the Central Health Medical Center for the Disabled, shown in the law on the securement of health rights & medical accessibility of the disabled should develop the standardized health enhancement programs for each disability type and severity. After examining the contents of health examination and health type of the disabled, the opinions about policies were suggested. Thus, in the future, there should be more detailed researches based on the tasks suggested by this study, and also the causal relations between health of the disabled and relevant programs should be continuously revealed.

본 연구는 국민건강보험공단의 장애와 건강통계 자료를 분석하여 장애인 건강검진 수검률을 살펴보고 건강검진에 따른 문제점과 향후 개선방안을 제시하고 건강검진 문진조사 결과를 바탕으로 장애인의 건강관리 형태 등을 소고하고자 한다. 연구대상은 장애인복지법 제2조에 따른 신체적, 정신적 장애로 오랫동안 일상생활이나 사회생활에서 제약을 받고, 2015. 12. 31. 기준 등록한 장애인2,479,080명 중 건강검진과 건강형태 조사에 참여한 장애인으로 한정하여 정책적 의견을 제시하였다. 결론으로 장애인 건강검진은 첫째, 장애인에 적합한 건강검진 서비스를 준비하기 위해서는 장애인 당사자들의 의견이 필요할 것이다. 둘째, 장애유형 및 중증도별 건강검진 항목 개발이 필요할 것으로 생각된다. 셋째, 장애인건강검진 의료장비 및 편의시설에 대하여 고민해 보아야 할 것이다. 넷째, 서비스 제공자에 대한 인력 확보와 교육이 필요할 것으로 생각된다. 다섯째, 장애인의 이동권을 확보할 수 있도록 하여야 할 것이다. 장애인의 건강형태는 첫째, 장애인 건강증진을 위한 각 영역별 전문가 협의체를 구성하여야 할 것이다. 둘째 장애인 건강증진 프로그램과 이를 운영하는 시설 현황분석이 필요할 것으로 생각된다. 셋째, 장애인건강권 및 의료접근성 보장에 관한 법률에 나와 있는 중앙장애인 보건의료센터에서 장애유형 및 중증도별 표준화된 건강증진 프로그램 개발이 필요할 것으로 생각된다. 지금까지 장애인 건강검진과 건강형태에 대한 내용을 살펴보고 이에 따른 정책적 의견을 제시하였다. 따라서 향후 연구로 본 연구에서 제시하고 있는 과제를 바탕으로 세부적인 연구들이 추진되길 바라며 장애인의 건강과 관련된 프로그램의 인과관계가 지속적으로 밝혀져야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. p.19-43, World Health Organization, (2011)
  2. National Rehabilitation Center for with Disabilities. Statistical Yearbook of Persons with Disabilities. p.124-163, National Rehabilitation Center (2017).
  3. National Rehabilitation Center. National Legislation Information Center website. http://www.nrc.go.kr/eng. (accessed., May, 2017).
  4. National Rehabilitation Center. Disability Health Care 2016. p.56-80, National Rehabilitation Center, (2017).
  5. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Survey of the disabled, p.56-80, Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2014)
  6. A. S. Goktepe. Bone density loss after spinal cord injury: Elite paraplegic basketball players vs. paraplegic sedentary persons. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol.83, pp. 279-283, (2014)
  7. J. H. Park. Strategies for Improving Health for the Disabled, p.98-132. Seoul National University, (2015).
  8. Ministry of Health and Welfare. National Rehabilitation Center. http://www.nrc.go.kr.eng. (accessed., May, 2018).
  9. Ministry of Health and Welfare.Korea Health Promotion Development Institute. The 4th Health Plan 2020, p.56-92, Ministry of Health and Welfare, (2015).
  10. L. Iezzoni, Eliminating Health And Health Care Disparities Among The Growing Population of People With Disabilities. Health Affairs, p.1947-1954, (2011)
  11. D. Acheson. The Acheson Report, full titled the Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report. A report published in 1998 by a United Kingdom in quiry headed. p.187-220, (1998).
  12. D. X. Cifu. Stewart D. G, Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation interventions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 73, pp. 431-436, (1999).
  13. National Spinal Cord Injury Statical Center. Annual statistical report for the spinal cord injury model systems. Alabama: p.17-18, National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, (2010).
  14. E. Mola, J. A. DeBonis, R. Giancane, Integrating patient empowerment as an essential characteristic of the discipline of general practice/family medicine. The European Journal of General Practice, Vol. 14, pp. 89-94, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13814780802423463
  15. W. A. Steiner. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Physical Therapy, Vol. 82, pp. 1098-1107, (2002).
  16. G. Stucki, J. D. Reinhardt, G. Grimby, Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part II: Conceptual descriptions and domains for research. Journal of Rehabilitative Medicine. Vol. 39, pp. 299-307, (2007). https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0051
  17. J. H. Rimmer. Use of the ICF in identifying factors that impact participation in physical activity/rehabilitation among people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation. Vol. 8, pp. 1087-1095, (2006).
  18. G. Stucki. Rationale and principles of early rehabilitation care after an acute injury or illness. Disability and Rehabilitation. Vol. 27, pp. 353- 359. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400014105
  19. NHS Screening Programmes in England. Equal Access to Breast and Cervical Screening for Disabled Women Sheffield: Duffield Printrs, Cancer Screening Series No 2. p.4-27, Public Health England, (2006).
  20. L. Norton, Spinal cord injury, Australia 2007-08. Australian Canberra: Institute of Health and Welfare. p.15-16. Australian Goverment, (2010).
  21. U. S. Department of Justice, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Access to medical care for individuals with mobility Disabilities. p.34-80. NW Washington, DC. (2010).
  22. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Demographic Yearbook 2004. Demographic Yearbook(book 56), pp. 105-196. New York, United Nations. (2007).
  23. J. Angus, L. Seto, N. Barry, N. Cechetto, S. Chandani, J. Devaney, S. Feranando, L. Muraca, F. Odette. Access to cancer screening for women with mobility disabilities. Journal of Cancer Education, Vol. 27, pp. 75-82, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0273-4
  24. K. Johnson, R. Strong, L. Hillier, M pitts. Screened out: women with disabilities and preventive health, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, Vol. 8, pp. 150-160, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410600802201
  25. A. Dixon, W. Horner. Peer Reviewed: Disability Status as an Antecedent to Chronic Conditions: National Health Interview Survey, 2006-2012. Preventing Chronic disease, Vol. 11, pp 184-193, (2014).
  26. S. M. Havercamp, D. Scandlin, M. Roth. (2004). Health disparities among adults with developmental diasbilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina. Public Health reports, Vol. 119(4), pp. 418-426, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phr.2004.05.006
  27. America NCHPAD Disable. Health promotion program. website http://www.nchpad.org/Directories/Programs. (accessed., May, 2017).
  28. C. T. Wang, N. Greenwood, L. F. White, J. Wilkinson. Measuring Preparedness for Mammography in Women with Intellectual Disabilities: A Validation Study of the Mammography Preparedness Measure. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 28, pp. 212-222, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12123