DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Collaborative Consumption Intentions and their Predictive Factors in High School Students

고등학생의 협력적 소비 의향 유형과 예측 요인

  • Jung, Joowon (Department of Home Economics Education, Dongguk University)
  • 정주원 (동국대학교 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2018.05.17
  • Accepted : 2018.06.30
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to categorize collaborative consumption intention in high school students based on providing and using collaborative consumption behaviors, to compare and analyze the factors that predict these. Data gathered from 418 high school students through an online survey were used to conduct a descriptive statistics analysis, cluster analysis, and multinomial logistic regression. Firstly, collaborative consumer intentions were classified into four groups, including a proactive group with high providing behaviors and using behaviors, an active providing group, an active using group, and a passive group with low providing and using behaviors. Secondly, mass media, social benefits, enjoyment, community effect, and reputation were revealed as factors that increased the potential for inclusion in the active groups, and home education, mass media, enjoyment, and reputation were factors that increased the potential for inclusion in the active providing group. Enjoyment was revealed as the factor that increased the potential for inclusion in the active using group. The results of the present study show that the active utilization of consumer education and a systematic approach are required to revitalize collaborative consumption and proper settlement. Furthermore, a systematic establishment of school consumer education is needed for the balanced development of collaborative consumption. Also, an environmental system in which actual expected benefits can be experienced and realized in a diverse manner should be created to encourage consumers collaborate more actively.

본 연구의 목적은 고등학생의 협력적 소비 의향을 제공행동과 이용행동을 기준으로 유형 분류한 후 각 군집 유형별로 소비자교육 경험과 기대 혜택의 예측 요인을 비교 분석하는 것이다. 온라인 설문조사를 통해 취합된 고등학생 418명의 자료를 사용하여 기술통계, 군집분석, 다항 로지스틱 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 협력적 소비 의향은 4가지 군집유형으로 분류되었다. 제공행동과 이용행동이 모두 높은 적극적 집단, 제공적극집단, 이용적극집단 그리고 제공과 이용행동이 모두 낮은 소극적 집단으로 유형화되었다. 둘째, 적극적 집단에 속할 가능성을 높여주는 요인은 대중매체, 사회적 편익, 즐거움, 커뮤니티효과, 평판으로 나타났으며, 제공적극집단에 속할 가능성을 높여주는 요인은 가정소비자교육과 대중매체, 즐거움과 평판으로 나타났다. 이용적극집단에 속할 가능성을 높여주는 요인으로는 즐거움으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해, 협력적 소비의 활성화와 올바른 정착을 위해 소비자교육의 체계적인 접근이 요구되어진다. 아울러 협력적 소비의 균형적인 발전을 위해서는 학교소비자교육에 대한 체계적 확립이 필요하며, 실질적인 혜택을 다양하게 경험할 수 있는 환경적 시스템이 마련되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Albinson, P. A., & Perera, B. Y. (2012). Alternative marketplace in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 11(4), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1389
  3. Axelrod, R. (2009). The evolution of cooperation. (K. S. Lee, Trans.). seoul: Systema. (Original work published 2006).
  4. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper Collins.
  5. Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., & Lutz, C. (2016). What's mine is yours (for a nominal fee)-Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.002
  6. Choi, K. S., & Park, M. S. (2016). The effect of consumer education on knowledge, attitude, intention, motivation, and consumption value for collaborative consumption of undergraduate students. Journal of Consumer Culture, 19(3), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2016.19.3.009
  7. Glind, P. (2013). The consumer potential of collaborative consumption (Unpublished master's thesis). Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  8. Hamari, J., Sjoklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552
  9. Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148660
  10. Hong, E. S., & Shin, H. Y. (2010). The Ethical consumptions and related variables of the undergraduate. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 28(5), 131-149.
  11. Jeon, S. Y. (2014). A study on factors that influence the use intention of online sharing economy platforms. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Jeong, Y. S., Lee, S. Y., & Jeong, D. Y. (2015). Influence of using motives of SNS on the activities : Mediating effects of cognitive reputation and flow. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 265-283.
  13. John, N. A. (2013). Sharing, collaborative consumption and Web 2.0. Media@LSE Electronic Working Paper, 26(1), 1-19.
  14. Jung, J. W. (2012). Study on adolescents' ethical consumption education experience and ethical consumption behavior. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 55(4), 351-362.
  15. Jung, J. W., & Choi, K. S. (2017). Effects of High School Student' Educational Experience and Expected Benefits on the Participation Intention of Collaborative Consumption. Family and Environment Research, 24(3), 191-208.
  16. Kang, B. J. (2012). Rural Social Enterprise Development Strategy: France, the United States, Japan, Korea, focusing on the comparison of social enterprises in rural areas. Journal of Regional Studies & Development, 21(1), 61-95.
  17. Kang, H. J. (2010). Study on the factor affecting healthy onsumption by adolescent consumers in Jeju. Unpublished master's thesis, The Graduate School of Education, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
  18. Kim, H. J., & Yoo, D. R. (2017). Study on consumption values of university students based on consumer education contents in middle and high school home economics textbooks. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 13(1), 27-53.
  19. Kim, J. H. (2014). Influencing factors the collaborative consumption intention of the contemporary consumer. Unpublished master's thesis, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
  20. Kim, K. Y. (2014). A Study on Typologing the Korean's Perception Schemata on the Business Value of Sharing Economy. Journal of Human Subjectivity, 29(29), 99-119.
  21. Ko, Y. S. (2014). A Study on Sharing Economy of the ICT development. Global e-Business Association, 15(1), 77-100.
  22. Korea JoongAng Daily (2017.12.17.). 2017년 서울시민이 뽑은 10대 정책... 1위는 '따릉이' http://news.joins.com/article/22210959
  23. Lamberton, C. (2016). Collaborative consumption: a goal-based framework. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1(10), 55-69.
  24. Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When ours is better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0368
  25. Latitude. (2010). The new sharing economy, Retrieved from http://latdsurvey.net/pdf/Sharing.pdf.
  26. Lee, E. H. (2001). The Study on the Necessity and Direction of Consumer Education for the Revitalization of Education the 21st Century. Journal of Consumption Culture, 4(3), 85-106.
  27. Lee, H. N., Sung, B. Y., & Hwang, H. S. (2016). An exploratory study on college student consumers' intention to participate in sharing economy services, Journal of Human Ecology, 20(1), 169-181.
  28. Lee, J. H., Oh, K. W., & Chae, J. M. (2012). The influence of school consumer education on cellular phone consumption behaviors of middle school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 24(2), 87-99.
  29. Lee, J. Y. (2016). Consumer perception and participation of collaborative consumption. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  30. Lehrer, E., & Moylan, A. (2014). Embracing the peer-production economy. National Affairs, 21(3), 51-63.
  31. Ministry of Education. (2015). 실과(기술.가정)교육과정. 교육부고시 제 2015-74호 [별책10].
  32. Moeller, S., & Wittkowski, K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: Reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 20(2), 176-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521011027598
  33. Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology: JASIST, 61(3). 555-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21278
  34. Park, H. S. (2016). A Study on Relationships between Perceived Risks, Perceived Values, Trust, and Intention to use for Sharing Economy Service : Focusing on Car Sharing Service. Unpublished master's thesis, Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea.
  35. Park, M. H. (2016). Consumers' experiences of collaborative consumption based on sharing economy service. Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(4), 175-205.
  36. Park, M. S. (2011). Consuming life education for community in the consumption 4.0 era. Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference.(pp.77-89)
  37. Park, Y. M., & Lee, H. S. (2015) The differences of the characteristics of adolescent consumers' socialization according to growth stages. Journal of consumer policy studies, 46(2), 133-163. https://doi.org/10.15723/jcps.46.2.201508.133
  38. Rhee, K. C., & Kim, J. E. (2012). Consumer Education: Theory & Practice. Seoul: Kyomunsa.
  39. Rha, J. Y. (2014). The sharing economy and social enterprises: a WOOZOO case. Journal of the Korea Service Managemant Society, 15(4), 107-124.
  40. Ryu, M. H. & Lee, Y. H. (2017). The effects of college students' characteristics of shared economy on intention to use sharing economy service: Focused on the moderating effect of consumer role attitudes. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 13(3), 67-93. https://doi.org/10.15790/cope.2017.13.3.067
  41. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New Present.
  42. Shim, S. J. (2016). An exploratory study on factors affecting intention to use of sharing economy services. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 163-183.
  43. So, Y. H., & Han, Y. J. (2013). Influence of mass media, peers' effects and conformity on the consumption-oriented attitude and conspicuous consumption of adolescent consumers. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 31(5), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2013.31.5.173
  44. Song, S. Y. (2015). The study on sharing economy services and consumer's rights promotion plan. Policy Analysis 15-08. Eumseong-gun: Korea Consumer Agency.
  45. Suh, Y. K. (2010). The effect of teenager consumer behavior on the parents' consumer behavior. Unpublished master's thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
  46. Tussyadiah, I. (2015, February). An Exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in Travel. Paper presented at Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015. Lugano, Switzerland.
  47. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667
  48. Yang, H. L., & Lai, C. Y. (2010). Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1377-1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.011
  49. Yoo, J. Y. (2004). Development of a school consumer education program for adolescents. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 26(6), 95-105.
  50. Yoon, E. R. (2014). Study on cognitive, emotional and social interface platform for collaborative consumption of public service. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.