Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics and development plan of Home Economics teachers' culture

가정과교사 문화의 특징과 발전 방안

  • Kim, Seung-Hee (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education Graduate School) ;
  • Chae, Jung-Hyun (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 김승희 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과 대학원) ;
  • 채정현 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2018.05.02
  • Accepted : 2018.06.26
  • Published : 2018.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to contribute to Home Economics(HE) teachers' culture by figuring out acknowledging characteristics of cultures of HE teachers and impeding factors on development of HE education. For this intensive interview were used. Intensive interviews were made with 14 HE teachers who completed coursework for master's or doctor's program of graduate school and belong to HE Teachers' Study Associations of each region or Korean Home Economics Education Association and analyzed by subject analysis method. The results of the study are as follows. First, HE teachers establish the philosophy of HE education, and practice education to provide profit to adolescents, their families, as well as society through HE class with their belief that HE is a practical and critical subject to benefit individual adolescents, families, and society. Second, HE teachers form culture to make an effort to continue to improve their expertises by attending graduate school, joining HE teachers' associations to enhance teaching methods, evaluation methods, and work ability or disclosing their own class. Third, HE teachers settle culture to conduct classes focusing on practical issues by converting the paradigm of HE education to that of practical critique. They also see that the system of three actions(technical action, communicative action, and emancipative action) should be applied in circulating ways to improve quality and value of life. Forth, for impeding factors of development of HE education, there are educational system and social recognition. However, with HE teachers' efforts, HE education settles well, as it reflects demands from students and society, finds students' talents, and actualizes its own goals. HE teachers believe that student will recognize that HE education is necessary for happiness of individuals and families. As a way to develop Home Economics teacher culture, Home Economics teachers should have the opportunity to develop more Home Economics teachers by participating in and working in research sessions in each area. It also called for a control tower to enable and lead collaborative networks between local Home Economics curriculum research committees. The Korean Home Economics Education Association should play a central role in the academic research community of each region and be able to help Home Economics teachers by moving more quickly and systematically to cope with the upcoming changes in education. Finally, participants said that in order to prepare a basic framework for the change in Home Economics education, practical critical Home Economics teacher training are needed. To this end, students can understand the essence of Home Economics education and establish their identity by taking a deeper Home Economics education curriculum philosophy for Home Economics teacher training.

본 연구의 목적은 가정과교사 문화의 특징과 가정과교육 발전의 저해 요소를 밝힘으로써 가정과교사 문화의 발전 방안을 제시하는데 있다. 이를 위해 집중면접의 주제 분석법을 실행하였으며, 각 지역 가정교과연구회 또는 한국가정과교육학회 소속 석사과정 이상인 가정과교사 14명을 대상으로 이루어졌다. 응답 자료 분석을 위해 주제 분석법을 실행하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가정과교사들은 가정과교육의 철학을 정립한 후 가정교과가 청소년 개인과 가정, 그리고 사회를 이롭게 하는 실천비판교과라는 신념을 확고히 가지고 가정과수업을 통해서 청소년과 그들의 가정, 더 나아가 사회에 유익을 주는 교육을 실천하고 있었다. 둘째, 가정과교사들은 대학원에 진학하거나 가정교과연구회에 가입하여 수업 방법, 평가 방법, 업무 능력을 향상시키고, 수업을 공개하는 등 지속해서 전문성을 향상시키기 위해서 노력하는 문화를 형성하고 있었다. 셋째, 가정과교사들은 가정과교육 패러다임을 실천비판 패러다임으로 전환하여 실천적 문제 중심 수업을 실행해야 한다는 문화를 자리매김하였다. 또한, 그들은 세 행동체계(기술적 행동, 의사소통적 행동, 해방적 행동)를 순환적으로 적용하여 삶의 질과 가치를 향상시켜야 한다고 보았다. 넷째, 가정과교육의 발전을 저해하는 요소에는 교육제도와 사회적 인식이 있었다. 하지만 가정과교사들의 노력으로 가정과교육은 학생과 사회적 요구를 반영한 교육, 학생의 적성을 찾아주며 가정교과의 목표를 잘 살린 교육으로 자리 잡고 있었고, 이를 통해 가정과교사들은 학생들이 가정교과가 개인과 가정의 행복을 위해 꼭 필요한 교과라는 인식의 전환을 가져올 수 있다고 믿었다. 가정과교사문화의 발전방안으로 가정과교사들은 각 지역의 가정교과연구회에서는 더 많은 가정과교사들이 연구회에 참여하고 활동함으로써 발전할 수 있는 기회를 마련해야 한다고 하였다. 또한 지역의 가정교과연구회끼리 협력적 네트워크를 활성화하고 이를 이끌 수 있는 컨트롤타워가 필요하다고 했다. 한국가정과교육학회는 각 지역의 교과연구회의 중심점 역할이 되어서 다가올 교육 변화에 더욱 신속하고 조직적으로 움직여 적극적으로 대처함으로써 가정과교사들의 힘이 될 수 있어야 할 것이다. 마지막으로 참여자는 가정과교육의 변화를 위한 기초적 틀을 마련하기 위해 실천 비판적 가정과교사 양성이 필요하다고 했다. 이를 위해 가정과교사 양성과정에서 학생들이 더욱 깊이 있는 가정교과교육철학을 수강함으로써 가정교육학의 본질을 이해하고 정체성을 확립하여 유능하고 성숙한 가정과교사로서의 자질을 갖출 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home Economics: A definition. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.
  2. Bak, H. H. (2005). Korean secondary school English teachers: Their school life and culture. Journal of Education Research, 3(1), 55-77.
  3. Chae, J. H., Lee, S. H., & Yoo, T. M. (2010). Social contribution and future direction of Home Economics Education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(4), 139-154.
  4. Chae, J. H., Park, M. J., Kim, S. G., & Han, J. (2017). Instruction to Home Economics Education. Seoul: Gyomoonsa.
  5. Chae, J. H., Park, M. J., Kim, S. G., Yu, N. S., Han, J., & Heo, Y. S. (2015). Home Economics Class Methods and Classroom Demonstration. Seoul: Gyomoonsa.
  6. Chae J. H., Yoo, T. M., & Park, M. J. (2007). The effects of practical reasoning Home Economics instruction on middle school students' views of Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 19(1), 65-79.
  7. Cho, J. S., Kim, S. M., & Kang, S. J. (2011). Current states and teachers perceptions of Technology.Home Economics in the 2009 revised national curriculum of the middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(4), 67-85.
  8. Cho, M. O., & Chae, J. H. (2005). Middle school Home Economics teachers' recognition of the importance and the level of teaching performance regarding the contents of morality of education in Home Economics instruction. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 17(2), 257-272.
  9. Cho, S. Y. (2016). Changes in critical thinking tendency and clothing attitude among middle school students via practical reasoning home economics instruction. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  10. Cho, Y, D. (2015). Qualitative research methodology : The new horizon of school and class research. Seoul: Sinjung.
  11. Choi, H. S. (2010). Usefulness and continuity of technology Home economics courses in the middle school to the Majors in Human Ecology at the college level department of Home Economics Education. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  12. Choi, J. H., & Jang, H. S. (2006). The problems, confidence and satisfaction of teachers on implementation of Technology and Home Economics subject in the 7th curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 18(1), 17-29.
  13. Choi, M. H. (2010). Problems on education field when powered by Technology and Home Economics Subject. Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference. Korea, 47-67.
  14. Go, M. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2010). Middle school home economics teachers' perception and actual performance of self-supervision at school related to Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(4), 91-107.
  15. Go, M. Y., & Yu, N. S. (2011). A study on teacher perception and classroom practice of practical problem-focused home economics instruction. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(1), 159-176.
  16. Gye, S. J., Lee, Y. S., Lee, J. W., Yang, S. H., Park, M. S., Choi, J. S.,....Choi, M. K. (2012). Family and culture. Seoul: Sinjung.
  17. Han, Y. U. (2015). A qualitative case study on the formation of teachers culture in a innovative pilot school. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  18. Hwang, K. W. (1992). An analytical study on the teacher's culture of Korean elementary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea University. Seoul, Korea.
  19. Hwang, K. W. (2002). The analysis of "Formed process of teacher's culture". The Journal of Research in Education, 17, 213-228.
  20. Im, H. K. (2014). The teaching profession life and culture of adapted Physical Education teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kangwon National University, Kangwon, Korea.
  21. Kim, B. C. (2003). A qualitative case study on the middle school teachers' cultures of the teaching profession. The Journal of Educational Administration, 21(1), 1-27.
  22. Kim, B. M. (2010). Micro study on teacher's culture of private Mirae high school. The Journal of Politics of Education, 17(4), 217-243.
  23. Kim, P. S. (1992). A study on the for formative factors of teacher' culture in Korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dankuk University, Seoul, Korea.
  24. Kim, S. G. (2007). Evaluation of TQM(Total Quality Management) of Home Economics Education by teachers & students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  25. Kim, S. G., & Chae, J. H. (2003). Home Economics teacher characteristics and affective morality through Home Economics instruction recognized by Middle School Students. Family and Environment Research, 41(10), 57-73.
  26. Kim, Y. J. (2009). The development of Measurement instrument and characteristics analysis of teachers' culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  27. Korea Educational Development Institute. (2001). Secondary school teacher : Their culture and everyday life (Research report RR 2001-4).
  28. Korea Educational Development Institute. (2005). Analyzing the work of teachers and school administrators and developing performance standards (Research report RR 2005-8).
  29. Kwon, K. Y., Lee, K. Y., & Lee S. H. (2011). Home Economics teachers' perception of Home Economics curriculum perspective and their instructional culture. Journal of Korean Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(4), 125-141.
  30. Lee, G. S., & Yoo, T. M. (2016). An action research for reflective practice of Home Economics teacher through professional learning community activity. Family and Environment Research, 54(4), 365-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.6115/fer.2016.028
  31. Lee, S. O. (2003). Ethnographic study of Teachers' Culture in December. Unpublished master's thesis, Inje University, Gyeong Nam, Korea.
  32. Lee, I. H. (1990). The culture of teaching profession in a Korean academic high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  33. Lee, J. S. (2000). Understanding the culture of elementary school teachers. Anthropology of Education, 3(3), 51-87.
  34. Lee, M. W., Han, S. B., & Kim. K. E. (2011). Cultural anthropology. Seoul: Seoul National University.
  35. Lee, S. H. (2018). A Narrative Inquiry for Living Health Teacher, Unpublished master's thesis, Kyonggi University, Kyonggi, Korea.
  36. Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 curriculum revision.
  37. Na, J. J. (1998). A study on teacher's worldlife and teachers' culture. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  38. Nam, Y, J., & Chae, J. H. (2008). Middle school home economics teachers' perception and needs of self supervision related to home economics subject matter. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 20(1), 45-62.
  39. Oh, Y. J. (2001). Secondary school teacher's life and cultural characteristics in their diaries. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 207-230.
  40. Park, H. J. (2005). Teaching behavior, teaching confidence and teaching satisfaction of Technology and Home Economics teachers Home Economics Education. Unpublished master's thesis, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
  41. Park, J. B., & Yang, J. H. (2006). Understanding teachers' culture in special schools. Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(1), 329-401.
  42. Park, K. H., Kim, S. G., & Chae, J. H. (2007). Home economics teachers' altruistic attitudes and the levels of morality teaching performance in Ulsan City. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 19(3), 77 -89.
  43. Park, M. J. (2006). A study on development strategies for the future Home Economics Education : focusing on Identity, Empowerment, and Vision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  44. Park, Y. S., & Jeon, J. S. (2005). Development of strategies & policy tasks for change of the culture of teaching profession. The Journal of Educational Administration, 23(3), 73-93.
  45. Sok, T. J. (1994). School culture, must change. Korean Association of Private Secondary School Principals, 69, 26-31.
  46. Son, H. G., & Yang, J. H. (2014). An in-depth look at sixth Grade Homeroom Teachers. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(3), 161-193. https://doi.org/10.32465/ksocio.2014.24.3.006
  47. Son, S. O., & Cho, J. S. (2003). The perception and satisfaction with the implementation of -Technology and Home Economics- of Middle school teachers. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 15(2), 21-33.
  48. Wang, S. S & Kim, S. J. (2008). A Study on the Selection System of New Appointment Candidates for the 2009 School year Design for the Domestic Education. Proceedings of the 2008 Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference. Korea, 31-90.
  49. Yu, N. S., & Chae. J. H. (2009). Home Economics teachers' reflection on pedagogical content knowledge in Home Economics Education(H-PCK). Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(2), 83-107.
  50. Yu, T. M. (2003). A basic study for the development of secondary Home Economics curriculum on characteristics and contents structure of Home Economics, literacy through Home Economics Education(1): A delphi study. Family and Environment Research, 41(10), 149-171.