Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Korean Type Regulatory Sandbox System : the Industrial Fusion Promotion Act, the Information and Communication Convergence Act, the Financial Innovation Act, A Study on the Regional Special Districts Act

한국형 규제 샌드박스 제도에 대한 비교분석 연구 : 산업융합촉진법, 정보통신융합법, 금융혁신법, 지역특구법을 중심으로

  • Choi, Ho-Sung (Division of Korea Association of University, Research Institute and Industry) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Dae (Division of Regional Business Innovation Policy, Ministry of SMEs and Startups)
  • 최호성 (한국산학연협회 산학연사업부) ;
  • 김정대 (중소벤처기업부 지역혁신정책과)
  • Received : 2019.02.14
  • Accepted : 2019.03.20
  • Published : 2019.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, there is a need to introduce a Korean-style restriction sandbox system that exempts or suspends existing regulations so that new products or services based on new technologies can be commercialized without restrictions. In response, the government reorganized the relevant statutes to promptly check regulations centering on four fields, including industrial convergence, ICT, FinTech, and regional innovation growth, and to allow experimental, proof and market releases by setting certain conditions(zone, period, scale, etc.). However, despite the same regulatory sandbox application, depending on the nature of the field applied, differences in application subject, whether application of regulatory specifics, system of push ahead decision-making and whether support of financial and taxation are shown. This research is intended to present efficient operation measures for successful settling of Korean-style regulation sandboxes by comparing and analyzing, centering on the Industrial Fusion Promotion Act in the Industrial Convergence Field, ICT field's Information and Communication Convergence Act, FinTech field's Financial Innovation Act and Regional Special Zone Act in the Regional Innovation and Growth Sector.

최근 신기술 기반의 새로운 제품이나 서비스를 규제 제약 없이 사업화를 진행 할 수 있도록 기존 규제의 유예 또는 면제를 시켜주는 한국형 규제 샌드박스(Sandbox) 제도의 도입 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 이에 정부에서는 산업융합, ICT, 핀테크 및 지역혁신성장 등 4개 분야를 중심으로 규제 여부를 신속히 확인하고, 일정한 조건(구역 기간 규모 등)을 설정하여 실험 실증과 시장출시를 허용하도록 관련 법령을 정비하고 있다. 그러나 동일한 규제 샌드박스가 적용됨에도 불구하고 적용되는 분야의 특성에 따라 신청주체, 규제특례의 적용여부, 의사결정 추진체계 및 재정 세제 지원여부 등의 차이점이 보인다. 본 연구는 규제 샌드박스가 적용되는 산업융합 분야의 산업융합촉진법, ICT 분야의 정보통신융합법, 핀테크 분야의 금융혁신법 및 지역혁신성장 분야의 지역특구법을 중심으로 비교 분석하여, 한국형 규제 샌드박스의 성공적인 안착을 위한 효율적인 운영방안을 제시하였다.

Keywords

Table 1. regulatory 3 set

DJTJBT_2019_v17n3_73_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Comparison of four laws related to the introduction of regulation sandboxes

DJTJBT_2019_v17n3_73_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. H. S. Choi & J. D. Kim. (2019). A Comparative Study on the Regulation-Free Special Zone and the Regional Special Development Zone, Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.031
  2. C. W. Lim. (2011). The meaning and main contents of the National Assembly's passage of the Industrial Fusion Promotion Act. Statistical Monthly of Machinery Industry, 2011(4), 30-35.
  3. J. H. Jung. (2015). Legal Issues on the Temporary Permit System under the Telecommunications Fusion Act. The Legal Essay, 39(2), 81-114.
  4. S. H. Yang. (2018). Reviewing the main contents of the Special Law on Financial Innovation Support. KIRI Weekly, 460, 1-8.
  5. H. O. Choi. (2017). [Regulatory Sandbox] Policy Trends and Implication. Trends and Issues, (33), 1-20.
  6. Y. H. Choi. (2018). Policy Issues for Regulatory Innovation in ICT Sector during the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Focusing on Regulatory Sandboxes. Korea Institute of Policy Planning Seminar, 2018(2), 3-10.
  7. H. G. Kang. (2018). a review of a special bill to support financial innovation. Economic Law Study, 17(3), 3-30.
  8. J. C. Nam. (2016). Measures to Promote Regional Economy through Regulatory Free Zone National Territory Policy Brief. (591), 1-6.
  9. K. J. Kim. (2018). administrative action law implications according to regulatory redesign. Legal Issues, 38(2), 169-218.
  10. H. Y. Lee. (2009). Regional Special Zone Policy and Regional Development. Homeland, 6-16.
  11. Y. W. Hwang & K. C. Kang. (2006). A Study on the Institutional Complement for the Revitalization of Regional Special Development Zone. Tourism Leisure Research, 18(4), 229-241.
  12. J. H. Jung. (2017). The relationship between regulation and innovation and misunderstanding: centering on the discussion of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of the Korean Institute of Policy Studies, 2017, 45-64.
  13. S. Y. Kim. (2018). UK regulatory sandboxes and implications. KIRI Weekly (Essue), 435, 10-17.
  14. M. J. Kim. (2016). Name the issue: the industrial ecology that makes regulation relaxed. Urban Affairs, 51(566), 12-13.
  15. S. T. Kim, S. H. Jeon & B. I. Lim. (2018). An Analysis on Macro-economic Effect of Tax Exemption in R&D Special Cluster, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(6), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.4156/jcit.vol8.issue6.50