Economic and Environmental Geology (자원환경지질)

The Korean Society of Economic and Environmental Geology (대한자원환경지질학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study by Subject on the New R&D Planning Process

신규 R&D 기획 프로세스에 관한 주체별 비교연구

  • Bae, Junhee (Policy & Planning Division, R&D Policy Department, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)) ;
  • Park, Jungkyu (Geoscience Platform Division, Northern Geoscience & Mineral Resources Strategy Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM))
  • 배준희 (한국지질자원연구원 정책기획본부 연구정책실) ;
  • 박정규 (한국지질자원연구원 지오플랫폼연구본부 북방지질자원전략센터)
  • Received : 2019.02.18
  • Accepted : 2019.06.26
  • Published : 2019.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to pro-actively respond to changes in government R&D policy and start to supplement the limitations of previous KIGAM R&D planning process. We looked out through the existing literature for a variety of R&D planning process, and analyzed the R&D planning process characteristics of each institution through the interview. As a result, we can be derived conclusions and implications from three sides, environmental analysis, demand excavation methods, R&D project configuration and selection method. In the case of environmental analysis and the overall need to enhance the skills and mega trend analysis by market trend analysis. And in the demand side, the institute need to establish challenging and specific R&D goals. In addition, in case of configuration and selection of R&D projects we derived several implications, such as convergence, SME support, resource analysis, selection of long-term project.

본 연구는 정부의 R&D 정책 변화에 선제적으로 대응하고 한국지질자원연구원에서 수립된 KIGAM R&D 기획 프로세스의 한계점으로 지적된 부분을 보완하기 위해 시작하였다. 기존 연구 문헌을 통해서 다양한 R&D 기획 프로세스에 대해 알아보았고, 인터뷰를 통해 각 기관별 특성 및 신규 R&D 기획 방법에 대해 분석하였다. 그 결과 환경분석, 수요발굴방법, 과제 구성 및 선정방법 세 가지 측면에서 결론 및 시사점을 도출하였다. 환경분석의 경우 전체적인 Mega Trend 분석을 하면서 기술 시장 별 Trend 분석을 강화해야 하고, 수요발굴방법의 경우 도전적이고 구체적인 목표 설정을 통해 수요를 찾아내야 한다. 또한 과제 구성 및 선정의 경우 융합연구과제, 중소기업지원, 자원분석, 장기과제 선정 등 여러 가지 시사점을 도출 할 수 있었다. 도출 된 시사점은 향후 한국지질자원연구원의 신규 R&D 기획 프로세스에 사용될 것이다.

Keywords

JOHGB2_2019_v52n3_243_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. R&D Planning Process Flow Chart of A company.

JOHGB2_2019_v52n3_243_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. R&D Planning Process Flow Chart of C company.

JOHGB2_2019_v52n3_243_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Advance development process of D company.

References

  1. Jun, S.P., Seo, J.H. and Son, J.K. (2013) A study of the SME Technology Roadmapping Program to strengthen the R&D planning capability of Korean SMEs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v.80, p.1002-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.022
  2. Korea institute of finance (KIF) (2013) Promotion of national R&D project commercialization. Research Report, 22-04, p.3-9.
  3. Korea institute of geoscience and mineral resources (KIGAM) (2014) 2015-2017 KIGAM Long-term Strategy.
  4. Korea institute of geoscience and mineral resources (KIGAM) (2015) Report on the results of the study group to establish a new KIGAM R&D planning system.
  5. Korea institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP) (2014) Case Study on the Planning of R&D Programs of United States. Research report 2014-020, p.1-101.
  6. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2014) Strategy of Government R&D Center for Small & Medium Enterprises. National Science and Technology Council, p.1-26.
  7. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2015a) Government R&D Innovation condition and Future Plan (Plan). p.1-27.
  8. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2015b) Government R&D Innovation Plan, p.1-8.
  9. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2015c) Government R&D Innovation Plan and Detailed Implementation Plan, p.1-20.
  10. National research council of Science & Technology (NST) (2018) National R&D Project PRIDE System Manual, p.1-124.
  11. Park, J.S., Park, S.Y., Lee, J.Y., Coh, B.Y. and Moon, Y.H. (2006) The Paradigm Shift in Public R&D Planning and Analysis on GRI's Research Planning. Korea Technology Innovation Society, p.185-201.
  12. Science and Technology Policy Institute (STEPI) (2014) New Methodologies for Designing Government R&D Program Structures. Article 2014-01, p.1-41.