DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시각장애인 당사자관점에 기초한 베리어프리 전시감상환경 연구

A Study on Creating Barrier-Free Exhibition Appreciation Environment based on the Visually Impaired Person's Perspectives

  • 김선희 (성균관대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 엄명용 (성균관대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 이의빈 (성균관대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 조준동 (성균관대학교 휴먼ICT 융합학과)
  • Kim, Sun-Hee (Department of Social Welfare, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Um, Myung-Yong (Department of Social Welfare, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lee, Eui-Bhin (Department of Social Welfare, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Cho, Jun-Dong (Department of Human ICT Convergence, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.26
  • 심사 : 2019.08.20
  • 발행 : 2019.08.28

초록

본 연구는 시각장애인 당사자관점에 기초한 베리어프리 전시감상공간 조성을 위한 사례연구이다. 연구참여자는 유의표집으로 중증시각장애인 4사례를 선정하여 심층인터뷰한 후 Yin의 사례분석방법을 활용하여 분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과 전시실 내부 접근성(3개 주제)과 몰입 가능한 전시 요구(6개 주제)에서 총 9개의 주제가 도출되었다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 실천적 정책적 학문적 제언을 한다. 첫째, 시각장애인이 감상에 몰입할 수 있는 작품에 대한 정보의 질을 확보하여 제공할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 시각장애인의 문화향유권 증진을 위해 베리어프리 생활인증제가 문화예술영역에 적용될 수 있도록 정책개편을 위한 노력이 필요하다. 실천적 정책적 과제를 실현하기 위해 과학기술 인문사회 문화예술 융합연구가 활성화 되어야 할 것이다.

The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of creating barrier-free exhibition-appreciation environment based on the visually impaired person's perspectives. Participants were selected by the purposeful sampling method. Researchers conducted a couple of in-depth interviews with four visually impaired persons. Yin's case study method was employed to analyze qualitative information. The analysis revealed nine sub-themes in two sections: three from 'accessibility within the exhibition room'; and six from 'demand for immersive exhibition environment.' Based on the results, following suggestions were presented: First, we need to provide quality information appropriate for artworks-appreciation; secondly, to ensure the visually impaired people to appreciate the culture and arts without any barrier, we need to extend certification of barrier-free living environment to exhibition-appreciation area. Finally, to facilitate these two tasks we need to encourage the convergence research among science and technology, humanities and society, and culture and arts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. United Nations.(2019.03.30) Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html.
  2. Ministry of Government Legislation. (2019.02.30.). Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/.
  3. Korea Disabled People's Development Institute. (2019.01.20.), Universal Environmental Design Certification Based on Barrier-Free Living Environment. www.koddi.or.kr.
  4. F. Candlin. (2003). Blindness, Art and Exclusion in Museums and Galleries. International Journal of Art and Design, 22(1), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00343
  5. S. E. Park, G. J. Shim & M. J. Ju. (2018). Concept of Disability Arts in the Context of Inclusive Arts. Korea Journal of Arts and Cultural Management, 11(2), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.15333/ACM.2018.12.30.39
  6. Y. O. Park. (2010). MuseumS and Social Role : Social Inclusion. Journal of Museum, 18(19), 67-86.
  7. Arts Council in Korea. (2016). Korea-UK Arts & Cultural Conference : Future Results Report of Arts and Culture and Arts's Policy.
  8. B. E. Jeoung. (2016). Culture and Arts Policy for the Social Involvement of Children with Disabilities. The Korean Association for Policy Studies Spring Conference, 29-59.
  9. G. Anthony, S. W. Philip. (2018). Third way: the renewal of social democracy. (S. J. Han & C. U. Park Trans). Third Way. Seoul: Book Together, (Original work published 2018).
  10. L. Carolind, R. John, W. Woollard. (2011). The Responsive Museum Working with Audiences in the Twenty-First Century. (Y. C. Lim & M. J. Ju, Trans). Museums Management, A Strategy for the management of Museums to Respond to Visitors. Seoul : Communication-books (Original work published 2006).
  11. H. E. Kim. (2005). Jan Assman's Cultural Memories. The Western History Society of Korea, 227-258.
  12. J. O. Tae. (2012). A Study on Meaning of Social Memory through Impage Reproduction. Focusing on the Memory of the 15th day of August 1945 in KBS. Doctoral Dissertation of Visual-Arts Graduate School at Sogang University.
  13. H. G. Kim. (2017). A Study on the Expansion of the Social Function in Museums: Focusing on the Inclusive Museums. Seoul : Korea Culture & Tourism Institute.
  14. J. W. Kim. (2019). A Case Study on Social & Culture Education at Inclusive Art Museum: Focusing on the representative Artists Exhibition . Culture and Arts Education Graduate School of Korea Nation University of Education.
  15. E. H. George. (2015). Learning in the Museum. (G. H. Ahn, H. G. Kim, S. A. Kim, H. Y. Joung Trans). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original work published 2011).
  16. J. Johnson. (2018). Sensory: Please Touch the Art. Art Education, 71(1), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1389580
  17. A. Hudson. (2018). Letting the Blind Man See : An Investigation Into Methods and an Evaluation to Improve Accessibility in Swedish Museum Exhibits for the Visually Impaired (Thesis) LUND UNIVERSITY.
  18. A. Eardley, C. Mineirom, P. Ride & J. Neves. (2016). Redefinding Access: Embracing multimodality, Memorability and Shared Experience in Museum. Curator, The Journal of Museum, 59(3), 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12163
  19. S. H. Kim, M. Y. Um & J. D. Cho. (2019). A Qualitative Study on the Process of Appreciating Exhibited Artworks by the Visually Impaired People: Aimed at Improving the Rights of Enjoying Culture and Arts. Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 23(1), 105-139. https://doi.org/10.16884/JRR.2019.23.1.105
  20. A. Saki et al. (2019). An Independent and Interactive Museum Experience for Blind People. ACM2019 May, 13-15.
  21. H. Leona, M. Kim, B, Matthew & B. Alan. (2019). Making Sense of Art : Access for Gallery Visitors with Vision Impairments. Association for Computing Machinery, CHI 2019 May, 4-9.
  22. S. J. Bae. (2018). Holding 'Disabled Month' Events focusing on Sport.Arts.Culture(10-12). The Seoul Institute World Urban Trends, 433, 1-27.
  23. Mistry of Health and Welfare. (2018). The Fifth Comprehensive Plan for the Inclusive Society in which the Disabled live on their Own (2018-2022).
  24. A. Hudson. (2016). Reprogrammjng the Art Institute : Changing Art Museums : New Relations. 2016 International Conference Documents of on the 30th Anniversary in the National Museum of Modern and Comtemporary Art. 28-29.
  25. G. M. Kim, G. R. Lim & E. J. Gho. (2014). Evaluation on the Application of Universal Design in National Museums by People with Visual Impairments. The Korean Journal of Visual Impairment, 30(2), 199-219.
  26. S. Nakagawa. (2004). Universal Design Manual. (S. J. You Trans). Seoul : Designworkers.
  27. J. I. Kwon, S. O. Kim, G. R. Lim & G. M. Kim. (2015). Analysis of Environmental Evaluation Elements for Universal Design at the Museum : Focusing on the Use Evaluation of Visually Handicapped and Non-Handicapped People. Korea Journal of Contents Associations, 15(6), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.06.125
  28. T. J. Noh, S. H. Kang, D. J. Son & J. K. Paik. (2011). A Research of Directional and Orientation Sign in Exhibition Convention Centers : Focusing on Universal Design. Journal of Integrated Design Research, 10(3), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.21195/jidr.2011.10.3.003
  29. M. Y. Lee & K. Y. Park. (2004). The Planning of Art Museum Exhibition for the Blind. The Architectural Institute of Korea, 24(1), 287-290.
  30. J. H. Chun & H. W. Kim. (2000). A Study on the Checklist for Interior Elements Influencing on Accessibility and Mobility of Visually Impaired Persons. Journal of Interior Design, 24, 208-219.
  31. Korea Disabled People's Development Institute. Universal Environmental Design Certification Based on Barrier-Free Living Environment. https://www.koddi.or.kr/data/edu.
  32. B. J. Choi. (2018). Transformation of Museum Concept as an Institution and Art for Visually Impaired. Korea Journal of History for Modern Art, 43, 225-247.
  33. The Center for Universal Design (n. d.) The Principles of Universal Design. https://projects.ncsu.edu.
  34. S. L. An & H. S. Yoon. (2019). Basic Study of Universal Design Using Five Senses. Korea Journal of Digital and Contents, 20(2), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.2.251
  35. American Foundation for the Blind. Creating a Comfortable Environment for People with Low Vision. http://www.afb.org.
  36. Gual, J., Puyuelo, M., & Lloveras, J. (2011). Universal design and visual impairment: tactile products for heritage access. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), 15-18 August 2011, Technical University of Denmark. https://www.designsociety.org.
  37. J. Strechay & T. Annis. (2012). Accessibility Issues Access to Museums and Parks for Patrons who are Blind or Visually Impaired, Accessible World Magazine, 13. www.afb.org.
  38. D. I. Chun, N. H. Kim & J. M. Seo. (2016). Comparative study on Differences in perception of human rights of people with disabilities and Staff in the Disabled Residential Facilities. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(8), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.8.11
  39. H. S. Lee, S. H, Lee & J. A. Choi. (2016). Redefining Digital Poverty : A Study on Target Changes of the Digital Divide Survey for Disabilities, Low-Income and Elders. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.1
  40. R. K. Yin. (2006). Case Study Research: Design and Methods(3rd ed), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  41. Y. S. Lincoln & E. G. Guba. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills.