The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education (컴퓨터교육학회논문지)

The Korean Association of Computer Education (한국컴퓨터교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating Online Learning Types Based on self-regulated learning in Online Software Education: Applying Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

온라인 소프트웨어 교육에서 학습자의 자기조절학습 관련 특성에 기반한 온라인 학습 유형 분석: 계층적 군집 분석 기법을 활용하여

  • 한정윤 (서울대학교 스마트 휴머니티 융합 사업단) ;
  • 이성혜 (KAIST 과학영재교육연구원)
  • Received : 2019.09.03
  • Accepted : 2019.09.27
  • Published : 2019.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to provide educational implications for more strategic online software education by the types of online learning according to learners' self-regulated learning characteristics in the online software education environment and examining the characteristics of each type. For this, variables related to self-regulated learning characteristic were extracted from the log data of 809 students participating in the online software learning program of K University, and then analyzed using hierarchical cluster analysis. Based on hierarchical cluster analysis learner clusters according to the characteristics of self-regulated learning were derived and the differences between learners' learning characteristics and learning results according to cluster types were examined. As a result, the types of self-regulated learning of online software learners were classified as 'high level self-regulated learning type (group 1)', 'medium level self-regulated learning type (group 2)', and 'low level self-regulated learning type (group 3)'. The achievement level was found to be highest in 'high-level self-regulated learning type (group 1)' and 'low-level self-regulated learning type (group 3)' was the lowest. Based on these results, the implications for effective online software education were suggested.

본 연구에서는 온라인 소프트웨어 교육 환경에서 학습자의 자기조절학습특성에 따른 온라인 학습 유형을 파악하고 각 유형의 특징을 살펴봄으로써 보다 전략적인 온라인 소프트웨어 교육을 위한 시사점을 제공하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 K대학의 온라인 소프트웨어 교육과정에 참여하고 있는 K-12 학생 809명의 온라인 학습 로그 데이터로부터 자기조절학습 특성 변인을 추출한 후, 계층적 군집 분석 기법(hierarchical cluster analysis)을 활용하여 자기조절학습 특성에 따른 학습자 군집 도출 및 군집 유형에 따른 온라인 학습 특성과 학습 결과의 차이를 비교 분석하였다. 그 결과, 온라인 소프트웨어 교육 학습자들의 자기조절학습 유형은 '고수준 자기조절학습형(군집 1)', '중수준 자기조절학습형(군집 2)', 그리고 '저수준 자기조절학습형(군집 3)'으로 나타났다. 온라인 자기조절학습 유형에 따른 학업성취도 수준은 '고수준 자기조절학습형(군집 1)'이 가장 높고, '저수준 자기조절학습형(군집 3)'이 가장 낮은 것으로 확인되었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 효과적인 온라인 소프트웨어 교육 운영을 위한 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (2015). 실과(기술.가정)/정보과 교육과정.
  2. 교육부.과학기술정보통신부 (2016). 소프트웨어 교육 활성화 기본계획.
  3. 과학기술정보통신부(2019). 2019년도 소프트웨어 영재학급 선정 지원. 2019.3 . 21. 보도자료
  4. EBS(2019). EBS SW 소개. Retrieved from https://www.ebssw.kr.
  5. 정현철.최연구.김상균.한기순.안동근.채유정.곽영순.류춘렬.백민정.이성혜.이영주.류지영.조석희(2018). 4차 산업혁명시대, 과학영재 어떻게 육성할 것인가. 학지사.
  6. Huang, T., Shu, Y., Chang, S., Huang, Y., Lee, S., Huang, Y., & Liu, C. (2014). Developing a self-regulated oriented online programming teaching and learning system. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Wellington, 2014, 115-120.
  7. Xia, B. S. & Liitiainen, E. (2017). Student performance in computing education: an empirical analysis of online learning in programming education environments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42 (6), 1025-1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1250066
  8. Robinson, P. & Caroll, J. (2017). An online learning platform for teaching, learning, and assessment of programming. 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Athens, 2017, 547-556.
  9. 성은모.진성희.유미나(2016). 학습분석학 관점에서 학습자의 자기주도학습 지원을 위한 학습 데이터 탐색 연구. 교육공학연구, 32(3), 487-533.
  10. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40 (4), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2
  11. Cho, M. H., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34 (3), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
  12. You, J. W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using lms data to predict course achievement in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.003
  13. Klingsieck, K.B., Fries, S., Horz, C., & Hofer, M. (2012). Procrastination in a distance university setting. Distance Education, 33 (3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.723165
  14. Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Fan, Y. T. (2013). Research trends in self-regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44 (5), 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12017
  15. Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van der Zee, T., Houben, GJ., & Paas, F. (2017). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 356-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
  16. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
  17. Cho, M. & You, J. S. (2017). Exploring online students' self-regulated learning with self-reported surveys and log files: a data mining approach. Interactive Learning Environment, 25 (8), 970-982. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1232278
  18. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Routledge.
  19. Pintrich, P.R. & De Groot E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  20. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
  21. Pintrich, P.R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield, & J.S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249-284). San Diego, CA: Academic.
  22. Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
  23. Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 260-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x
  24. Lehmann, T., Hahnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051
  25. Wang, C. H., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2013). Students' characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning, Distance Education, 34 (3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
  26. You, J. W. (2015). Examining the effect of academic procrastination on achievement using LMS data in e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (3), 124-134
  27. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
  28. Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 593-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
  29. Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12 (1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
  30. Smith, V. C., Lange, A., & Huston, D. R.(2012). Predictive modeling to forecast student outcomes and drive effective interventions in online community college courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16 (3), 51-61.
  31. Brooks, C., Erickson, G., Greer, J., & Gutwin, C. (2014). Modelling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Computers & Education, 75, 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.002
  32. Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Kashy, D.A., Kortemeyer G., & Punch, W.F., (2003). Predicting Student Performance: An Application of Data Mining Methods with an educational Web-based System. (IEEE/ASEE) FIE 2003 Frontier In Education, Nov. 2003 Boulder, Colorado.
  33. 노일경.이성혜 (2016). 재직 학습자의 원격고등교육과정에서의 학습활동 특성 및 학업성취 연양 변인 분석: 학습분석을 적용하여. 평생학습사회, 12(4), 53-78.
  34. 나일주.임철일.조영환 (2015). 학습분석 모델 및 확장 방안 연구 보고서. 창조 경제 비타민 L 프로젝트 위탁연구. 서울특별시교육청, 서울대학교.
  35. 조일현.김윤미 (2013). 이러닝에서 학습자의 시간관리 전략이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향: 학습분석학적 접근. 교육정보미디어연구, 19(1), 83-107.31
  36. Macfadyen, L. & Dawson, S. P. (2012). Numbers are not enough. why e-learning analytics failed to inform an institutional strategic plan. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (3), 149-163.
  37. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., & Franklin, J. (2005). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 27 (2), 83-85.
  38. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning. New York:Springer.
  39. Hair, J. F., & Black, W. C. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grim & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics. (pp. 147-205). Washington, DC: Psychological Association.
  40. Ward, J. H. (1968). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
  41. Langfelder, P., Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2007). Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R. Bioinformatics, 24 (5), 719-720. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm563
  42. 김갑수.이미숙(2005). 컴퓨터 기능 교육에서 초인지를 이용한 협력적 성찰 수업모형의 개발 및 적용. 정보교육학회논문지, 9(2), 339-348.
  43. 김갑수 (2009). 초등학생들을 위한 프로그래밍 언어 교육 방법론, 한국초등교육, 19(2), 135-152.
  44. 성은모.채유정.이성혜 (2019). 온라인 소프트웨어 교육 학습자들의 자기주도학습 유형 분류 및 특징 분석. 한국컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 22(1), 31-46.

Cited by

  1. 온라인 문제기반학습에서의 학습행태 분석: 학습분석 기법을 적용하여 vol.23, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2020.23.1.007