The Journal of the Korean dental association (대한치과의사협회지)

The Korean Dental Association (대한치과의사협회)
권호 표지

Stability of camouflage treatment using mandibular full arch distalization in Skeletal Class III malocclusion

성인 골격성 III급 부정교합 환자에서 하악 전치열 후방이동 절충치료의 안정성

  • Song, Ho Jin (Department of Orthodontics, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Yu, Hyung Seog (Department of Orthodontics, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
  • 송호진 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 유형석 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과교정학교실)
  • Published : 2019.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Skeletal Class III malocclusion is a relatively common form of malocclusion in Korea. In borderline cases where only mild skeletal discrepancy exists and if worsening of the facial profile is expected as a result of premolar extraction, mandibular full arch distalization with miniscrews is the treatment of choice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pattern of tooth movement and evaluate the stability of mandibular full arch distalization and to identify correlation between stability and factors such as initial skeletal pattern, dental changes during treatment and alveolar bone in symphysis region using lateral cephalograms.

Keywords

References

  1. Hardy DK, Cubas YP, Orellana MF: Prevalence of angle dass III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Journal of Epidemiology 2(04): 75, 2012 https://doi.org/10.4236/ojepi.2012.24012
  2. Yu HS, Ryu YK, Lee JY: A study on the distributions and trends in malocclusion patients from department of orthodontics, college of dentistry, Yonsei university. Korean Journal of Orthodontics 29(2):267-276, 1999
  3. Nakamura M, Kawanabe N, Kataoka T, Murakami T, Yamashiro T, Kamioka H: Comparative evaluation of treatment outcomes between temporary anchorage devices and Class III elastics in Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151(6):1116-1124, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.040
  4. Oh YH, Park HS, Kwm TG: Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139(4):470-481, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.037
  5. Sugawara J, Daimaruya T, Umemori M, Nagasaka H, Takahashi I, Kawamura H, et al.: Distal movement of mandibular molars in adult patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125(2): 130-138, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.02.003
  6. Su H, Han B, Li S, Na B, Ma W, Xu TM: Campensation trends of the angulation of first molars: retrospective study of 1403 malocclusion cases. Int J Oral Sci 6(3): 175-181, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2014.15
  7. Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D: Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 40(5): 519-530, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx093
  8. Furstman L, Bernick S, Aldrich D: Differential response incident to tooth movement. Am J Orthod 59(6): 600-608, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90007-8
  9. Suzuki M, Deguchi T, Watanabe H, Seiryu M, likubo M, Sasano T, et al.: Evaluation of optimal length and insertion torque for miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144(2): 251-259, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.021
  10. Ricketts RM: A four-step method to distinguish orthodontic changes from natural growth. J Clin Orthod 9(4): 208-215, 218-228, 1975
  11. Monga N, Kharbanda OP, Samrit V: Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150(2): 274-282, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.014
  12. Kim SJ, Choi TH, Baik HS, Park YC, Lee KJ: Mandibular posterior anatomic limit for molar distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146(2): 190-197, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.021
  13. Solow B: The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod 7(3): 145-161, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.7.3.145
  14. Handelman CS: The anterior alveolus: its importance in limmng orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 66(2): 95-109; discussion 109-110, 1996
  15. Molina-Berlanga N, Llopis-Perez J, Flores-Mir C, Puigdollers A: Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among Class I and III malocclusion patients with different facial vertical skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod 83(6): 948-955, 2013 https://doi.org/10.2319/011913-48.1
  16. Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P: Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110(3): 239-246, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80006-0
  17. Sharpe W, Reed B, Subtelny JD, Polson A: Orthodontic relapse, apical root resorption, and crestal alveolar bone levels. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 91(3): 252-258, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90455-0
  18. Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciger S, Ariyurek M: Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122(1): 15-26, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.119804
  19. Berrer HG: Treatment timing-onset or onslaught? J Clin Orthod 5(4): 191-199, 1971