DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Evaluation Model for Analyzing the Overlay Error of Computer-generated Holograms

  • Gan, Zihao (College of Intelligence Science, National University of Defense Technology) ;
  • Peng, Xiaoqiang (College of Intelligence Science, National University of Defense Technology) ;
  • Hong, Huajie (College of Intelligence Science, National University of Defense Technology)
  • Received : 2020.04.21
  • Accepted : 2020.06.23
  • Published : 2020.08.25

Abstract

Computer-generated holograms (CGH) are the core devices to solve the problem of freeform surface measurement. In view of the overlay error introduced in the manufacturing process of CGH, this paper proposes an evaluation model for analyzing the overlay error of CGH. The detection method of extracting CGH profile information by an ultra-depth of field micro-measurement system is presented. Furthermore, based on the detection method and technical scheme, the effect of overlay error on the wavefront accuracy of CGH can be evaluated.

Keywords

References

  1. K. P. Thompson and J. P. Rolland, "Freeform optical surfaces: a revolution in imaging optical design," Opt. Photon. News 23, 30-35 (2012).
  2. Z. Feng, B. D. Froese, C.-Y. Huang, D. Ma, and R. Liang, "Creating unconventional geometric beams with large depth of field using double freeform-surface optics," Appl. Opt. 54, 6277-6281 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.006277
  3. P. J. Smilie and T. J. Suleski, "Variable-diameter refractive beam shaping with freeform optical surfaces," Opt. Lett. 36, 4170-4172 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.36.004170
  4. Y. Xie, X. Mao, J. Li, F. Wang, P. Wang, R. Gao, X. Li, S. Ren, Z. Xu, and R. Dong, "Optical design and fabrication of an all-aluminum unobscured two-mirror freeform imaging telescope," Appl. Opt. 59, 833-840 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.379324
  5. Z. Pang, Z. Ma, X. Fan, and G. Zou, "Design and fabrication of CGH for 600 mm diameter SiC primary mirror surface figure testing," Proc. SPIE 9684, 96842J (2016).
  6. A. G. Poleshchyk and R. K. Nasyrov, "High-precision aspherical wavefront shaping with combined computer generated holograms," Proc. SPIE 8759, 875929 (2013).
  7. Z.-H. Gan, X.-Q. Peng, S.-Y. Chen, C.-L. Guan, H. Hu, X.-L. L, and Z.-C. Dai, "Fringe discretization and manufacturing analysis of a computer-generated hologram in a null test of the freeform surface," Appl. Opt. 57, 9913-9921 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.57.009913
  8. P. Su, J. Ma, Q. Tan, G. Kang, and Y. Liu, "Computer generated hologram null test of a freeform optical surface with rectangular aperture," Opt. Eng. 51, 025801 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.51.2.025801
  9. R. Zehnder, J. H. Burge, and C. Zhao, "Use of computer generated holograms for alignment of complex null correctors," Proc. SPIE 6273, 62732S (2006).
  10. H.-G. Rhee and Y.-W. Lee, "Improvement of linewidth in laser beam lithographed computer generated hologram," Opt. Express 18, 1734-1740 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.001734
  11. S. M. Arnold, "Electron beam fabrication of computergenerated holograms," Opt. Eng. 24, 245803 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.7973578
  12. H. Shen, R. Zhu, Z. Gao, E. Y. B. Pun, W. H. Wong, and X. Zhu, "Design and fabrication of computer-generated holograms for testing optical freeform surfaces," Chin. Opt. Lett. 11, 032201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3788/COL201311.032201
  13. A. G. Poleshchuk, V. P. Korolkov, R. K. Nasyrov, and J. M. Asfour, "Computer generated holograms: fabrication and application for precision optical testing," Proc. SPIE 7102, 710206 (2008).
  14. J. Feng, C. Deng, and T. Xing, "Design and error analysis of the computer-generated hologram used for concave aspheric surface testing," Laser Optoelectron. Prog. 49, 110902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3788/LOP49.110902
  15. R. Maini and H. Aggarwal, "Study and comparison of various image edge detection techniques," Int. J. Image process. 3, 1-11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr:20080080