한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)

  • 제41권3호
  • /
  • Pages.553-568
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1598-3099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8436(eISSN)
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등학교 교사의 과학 PCK에 대한 학업 열정 수준 및 영향 요인 탐색

An Exploratory Study on Level and Influencing Factors of Academic Passion for Elementary School Teachers' Science PCK

  • 투고 : 2022.07.27
  • 심사 : 2022.08.08
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 초등학교 교사의 과학 PCK에 대한 학업 열정 수준과 그 열정에 영향을 미친 요인을 조사하였다. 이를 위해 서울특별시 소속 초등학교 교사 161명을 선정한 후, 과학 내용학 및 과학 교육학에 대한 학업 열정 검사를 시행하였다. 또한 일부 교사를 대상으로 개별적인 심층 면담을 시행하였다. 연구 결과, 과학 내용학 및 과학 교육학 학습에 대해 '중요함'과 '조화열정'은 높은 수준, '시간/에너지 투자'와 '강박열정'은 보통보다 약간 높거나 낮은 수준이었다. 과학 내용학 학습에 대한 '좋아함'은 비교적 높은 수준이었지만, 과학 교육학 학습에 대한 '좋아함'은 보통보다 약간 높은 수준이었다. 교직 경력보다 학부 과학 심화전공 여부에 따른 과학 내용학 및 과학 교육학에 대한 학업 열정의 차이가 더 크게 나타났다. 초등학교 교사는 과학 PCK에 대한 열정에 영향을 미친 요인으로 '개인의 관심 및 흥미', '고등학교 계열', '학부 과학 심화전공 여부', '과학 관련 대학원 진학 여부', '초등학교에서 과학을 가르친 경험', '영재교육원에서 과학을 가르친 경험', '과학 전담 교사 담당 경험', '과학 관련 교사 연수', '과학 관련 교수-학습 자료 개발 경험', '과학 및 과학영재 관련 업무 담당 경험', '과학 관련 교사공동체 참여 경험' 등을 골고루 선택하였다. 그러나 그 선택 비율에서는 학부 과학 심화전공 여부에 따라 약간의 차이가 있었다. 이를 바탕으로 초등학교 교사의 과학 PCK에 대한 학업 열정을 높이는 방법을 제안하였다.

This study investigated the level of academic passion for elementary school teachers' science pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and examined the factors that influence the passion. To this end, 161 elementary school teachers in Seoul were selected, and academic passion tests were then administered to evaluate their academic passion for science subject matter knowledge and science pedagogical knowledge. Individual in-depth interviews were also conducted with some of the participating teachers. The results revealed that 'importance' and 'harmonious passion' for learning science subject matter knowledge and science pedagogical knowledge were found at a high level. However, 'time/energy investment' and 'obsessive passion' for learning the knowledge were slightly higher or lower than normal. The 'like' for learning science subject matter knowledge was relatively high, but the 'like' for learning science pedagogical knowledge was slightly higher than normal. The differences in academic passion for science subject matter knowledge and science pedagogical knowledge were greater according to advanced major at undergraduate than teaching career. The teachers evenly selected some factors that influenced their academic passion for science subject matter knowledge and science pedagogical knowledge. These identified characteristics included 'individual interest', 'high school track', 'experience in advanced major at undergraduate', 'experience in science-related graduate school', 'experience teaching science in elementary school', 'experience teaching science at the gifted education institute', 'experience in charge of science subject teacher', 'experience in science-related teacher training', 'experience in developing science-related teaching and learning materials', 'experience in charge of science or science-gifted related work', and 'experience in a science-related teacher community'. However, a slight difference was noted in the selection ratio depending on advanced major at undergraduate. Based on these results, the practical implications for improving their academic passion for science PCK are suggested.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 2022학년도 서울교육대학교 연구교수 지원에 의하여 연구되었음

참고문헌

  1. Aydin, S., & Boz, Y. (2013). The nature of integration among PCK components: A case study of two experienced chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 615-624. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00095H
  2. Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Akin, F. N., & UzuntiryakiKondakci, E. (2015). The nature and development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.008
  3. Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2019). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1141-1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z
  4. Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R. J., Fernet, C., & Guay, F. (2008). The role of passion for teaching in intrapersonal and interpersonal outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 977-987. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012545
  5. Cho, A., & Kim, S. (2019). The effects of a professional learning environment at a day care center on the professionalism of beginning teachers: Focusing on the mediating role of their work task motivation. Korean Journal of Childcare & Education, 15(5), 113-138.
  6. Cho, H., & Ko, Y. (2008). Re-conceptualization of secondary science teacher's pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and its application. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 618-632.
  7. Hong, M., Jung, Y., & Sohn, Y. (2016). Validation of the Korean passion scale. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 30(2), 1-26.
  8. Ji, S., & Park, J. (2016). The beginning elementary school teachers' difficulties to suffer in the science classes from the perspective of content knowledge and teaching method. Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2016.40.2.116
  9. Kang, H. (2021). Comparison of science academic passion between elementary general and science-gifted students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 40(4), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2021.40.4.421
  10. Kim, H. (2012). A study on passion for teaching, teacher motivation, and teacher-efficacy of Korean early childhood preservice teachers. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 17(6), 249-275.
  11. Kim, M., & Park, J. (2015). Teachers and students' difficulties to suffer in the classes on "World of small living things" unit of elementary school science. Biology Education, 43(3), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2015.43.3.240
  12. Kim, S., & Kim, N. (2019). How obsessive passion and harmonious passion affect work-related outcomes: A study of distinctive mediating mechanisms. Journal of Organization and Management, 43(3), 103-130.
  13. Kim, S., & Lim, H. (2020). The development and validation of academic passion scale for elementary school students. The Journal of Elementary Education, 33(3), 171-200.
  14. Lee, B. (2020). Teaching choice on passion for teaching and career preparation behavior of pre-service teachers. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 11(2), 2283-2296.
  15. Lee, K., & Cha, H. (2013). A case study of pedagogical content knowledge of elementary school teachers according to their exclusive responsibility of science and their majors. KNUE Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 135-150.
  16. Lee, K., & Choi, E. (2015). Structural relationships between learning organization culture, teacher's learning motivation, LMX of principal-teacher, teaching professionalism perceived by elementary school teachers. The Journal of Elementary Education, 28(4), 193-217.
  17. Lim, A., & Jhun, Y. (2014). An analysis of teachers and students' difficulties in the classes on "Electric circuit" unit of elementary school science curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 597-606. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2014.33.3.597
  18. Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2007). The moderating effect of passion on the relation between activity engagement and positive affect. Motivation and Emotion, 31(4), 312-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9071-z
  19. Marsh, H. W., Vallerand, R. J., Lafreniere, M. K., Parker, P., Morin, A. J. S., Carbonneau, N., Jowett, S., Bureau, J. S., Fernet, C., Guay, F., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Paquet, Y. (2013). Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 796-809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032573
  20. Noh, T., Lee, J., & Kang, H. (2012). A case study on the changes in teaching professionalism of beginning science-gifted education teachers through mentoring in the aspects of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(8), 1187-1203. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.7.1187
  21. Noh, T., Park., J., & Kang, H. (2016). Interactions among PCK components of pre-service secondary chemistry teachers considered in processes of making written test items. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(5), 769-781. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.5.0769
  22. Park, K., & Chung, Y. (2018). A case study on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) search and instructional practice of two novice high school science teachers. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 22(5), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2018.22.5.293
  23. Park, S., & Chen, Y. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022
  24. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  25. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  26. Song, M., & Kim, S. (2014). A case study of the PCK of middle school science teachers on the Mendelian genetics. Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 718-736. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2014.38.3.718
  27. Sung, S., & Yeo, S. (2018). Development and application of teachers professionalism scale on elementary science teaching. The Journal of Education, 38(2), 153-170.
  28. Uhm, J., & Kim, H. (2020). Changes in teaching practices of elementary school teachers in scientific modeling classes: Focused on modeling pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 543-563. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.5.543
  29. Vallerand, R. J. (2015). The psychology of passion: A dualistic model. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  30. Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C. F., Leonard, M., Gagne, M., & Marsolais, J. (2003). The passions of the soul: Obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756-767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756
  31. Vallerand, R. J., Mageau, G. A., Elliot, A. J., Dumais, A., Demers, M. A., & Rousseau, F. (2008). Passion and performance attainment in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(3), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.05.003
  32. Vallerand, R. J., Paquet, Y., Philippe, F. L., & Charest, J. (2010). On the role of passion in burnout: A process model. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 289-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00616.x
  33. Wiener, G. J., Schmeling, S. M., & Hopf, M. (2018). The technique of probing acceptance as a tool for teachers' professional development: A PCK study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(6), 849-875. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21442
  34. Yang, J., & Choi, A. (2020). Pedagogical content knowledge for science practice-based instruction developed by science teachers in a teacher learning community. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 565-582. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.5.565
  35. Yoon, H. (2004). Pre-service elementary teachers' difficulties in science lessons. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(1), 74-84.