Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine (정신신체의학)

Korean Psychosomatic Society (한국정신신체의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Temperament and Cognitive Function Between Basketball and Baseball Players

농구 선수와 야구 선수의 기질 및 인지 기능의 비교

  • Kun Jung Kim (Department of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Doug Hyun Han (Department of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Sun Mi Kim (Department of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Myung Jin Oh (College of Medicine, Chung Ang University) ;
  • Ju Hyung Yoo (College of Medicine, Chung Ang University) ;
  • Dong Min Lee (College of Medicine, Chung Ang University) ;
  • Kyoung Joon Min (Department of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Hospital)
  • 김건중 (중앙대학교병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 한덕현 (중앙대학교병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 김선미 (중앙대학교병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 오명진 (중앙대학교 의과대학 의학부) ;
  • 유주형 (중앙대학교 의과대학 의학부) ;
  • 이동민 (중앙대학교 의과대학 의학부) ;
  • 민경준 (중앙대학교병원 정신건강의학과)
  • Received : 2023.09.08
  • Accepted : 2023.11.27
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study was investigating the differences in temperament, personality, and cognitive function among athletes and non-athletes, as well as differences within athlete groups participating in different-paced sports like baseball and basketball. Methods : A total of 57 professional basketball players, 51 professional baseball players, and 44 non-athletes subjected to temperament and characteristics inventory assessments and computerized neurocognitive function test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to analyze the average differences in demographic characteristics, temperament, personality traits, and cognitive functions among the three groups, followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests. Comparisons between starters and non-starters within the athlete groups were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results : In the analysis of temperament, the basketball and baseball player groups exhibited higher reward dependence and persistence compared to the control group. Additionally, in the assessment of personality traits, both basketball and baseball player groups scored higher in self-directedness and cooperativeness compared to the control group, whereas self-transcendence scores were lower. In cognitive ability assessments, baseball and basketball players outperformed the control group in emotional perception tests. Both baseball and basketball players showed lower card movement counts compared to the control group. Conclusions : This study compared the differences in temperament, personality, and cognitive abilities between professional basketball and baseball players and non-athletes. These results provide valuable insights into the temperament, personality, and cognitive abilities of professional athletes, contributing important information for athlete development and coaching goals in the future.

연구목적 과거 스포츠 선수의 신체, 기술적인 능력에 초점이 맞추어 훈련하던 경향과 더불어 최근 선수의 기질, 성격 그리고 인지 능력과 같은 심리적인 요소의 중요성에도 초점이 집중되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 성격 및 기질과 인지기능에 따라 선수들 및 일반인들 사이에서 차이가 있을 것으로 생각하였다. 더불어 차례가 정해져 있고 느린 템포의 경기를 하는 야구 선수와 빠른 템포의 경기를 하며 순간적인 판단을 자주하는 농구 선수 간의 기질과 인지 기능에도 차이가 있을 거라 예상했다. 방법 2023년 한해 동안 프로 농구팀에 소속되어 있는 선수 57명, 프로 야구팀에 소속되어 있는 선수 51명, 선수 생활을 해본 적 없는 일반인 44명을 대상으로 기질 및 성격 검사, 컴퓨터화된 신경인지 평가를 실시하였다. 세 군의 인구 특성, 기질 및 성격 특성, 인지 기능의 평균 차이를 일원분산분석을 사용하여 분석하였고 Bonferroni 사후검증을 실시하였다. 주전과 비주전 선수들간의 기질 및 성격, 인지 기능의 비교는 Mann-Whitney U test 를 사용하여 분석하였다. 결과 세 군간의 기질 비교에서, 보상의존, 지속성은 농구 선수와 야구 선수 그룹이 대조군에 비해서 높았다. 성격 검사에서는 자기지향성과 연대감은 농구 선수와 야구 선수 그룹에서 대조군보다 높았던 반면 자기초월은 농구와 야구 선수 그룹에서 대조군에 비해 낮았다. 농구 선수 그룹에서 주전 선수들은 비 주전 선수들에 비해서 자기지향성과 연대감의 점수가 높았다. 인지 능력 검사인, 감정지각 검사에서, 야구 선수와 농구 선수가 대조 군에 비하여 correction rate가 높았다. 심적회전 검사에서 농구 선수 그룹이 가장 correction rate가 높았고, 카드정렬 검사에서는 야구 선수와 농구 선수 그룹의 움직인 카드 횟수가 대조군에 비해 낮았다. 야구 선수와 농구 선수 그룹에서 주전 선수의 감정지각 검사 correction rate가 비 주전 선수에 비하여 높았다. 농구 선수 그룹에서 주전 선수의 심적회전 검사 correction rate가 비주전 선수에 비하여 높았다. 결론 이번 연구를 통해 프로 농구 및 야구 선수들과 일반인 간의 성격, 기질 그리고 인지 능력 차이를 비교하였다. 프로 선수들의 기질은 일반인과 비교하여 높은 보상의존과 지속성 경향성을 보였다. 성격에선 프로 선수가 일반인과 비교하여 자기지향성과 연대감 경향성이 높았지만 자기초월성 점수는 낮았다. 인지 능력 검사에서 감정지각 검사, 심적회전 검사, 카드정렬 검사 모두 운동 선수가 일반인보다 능력이 뛰어남을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 결과들은 프로 선수들이 성격, 기질 및 인지 능력 면에서 일반인과 차이가 있으며 이는 선수 육성과 지도 목표에 대해 중요한 정보를 제공하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yoo BC. "2019 Sports Industry White Paper";2019.
  2. Nakamoto H, Mori S. Sport-specific decision-making in a Go/NoGo reaction task: difference among nonathletes and baseball and basketball players. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2008;106:163-170. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.106.1.163-170
  3. NCAA. NCAA Sports Sponsorship and Participation Rates Database;2021. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/ncaa-sports-sponsorship-andparticipation-rates-database.
  4. 2022 KBO Rookie Draft Open. https://wwwkoreabaseballcom/News/Notice/Viewaspx?bdSe=8148.
  5. La Place JP. Personality and its relationship to success in professional baseball. Research Quarterly American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation 1954;25:313-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1954.10624973
  6. Allen MS, Greenlees I, Jones M. An investigation of the fivefactor model of personality and coping behaviour in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences 2011;29:841-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.565064
  7. Allen MS, Greenlees I, Jones M. Personality in sport: a comprehensive review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2013;6:184-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2013.769614
  8. Davis C, Mogk JP. Some personality correlates of interest and excellence in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1994.
  9. Hoyt AL, Rhodes RE, Hausenblas HA, Giacobbi Jr PR. Integrating five-factor model facet-level traits with the theory of planned behavior and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2009;10:565-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.02.008
  10. Judge TA, Ilies R. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002;87:797.
  11. Han DH, Kim JH, Lee YS, Bae SJ, Bae SJ, Kim HJ, Sim MY, Sung YH, Lyoo IK. Influence of temperament and anxiety on athletic performance. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine 2006;5:381.
  12. Kang KD, Han DH, Hannon JC, Hall MS, Choi JW. Temperamental predictive factors for success in Korean professional baseball players. Psychiatry Investigation 2015;12:459.
  13. Monasterio E, Alamri YA, Mei-Dan O. Personality characteristics in a population of mountain climbers. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 2014;25:214-219.
  14. Laborde S, Guillen F, Mosley E. Positive personality-traitlike individual differences in athletes from individual-and team sports and in non-athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2016;26:9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.05.009
  15. Kalen A, Bisagno E, Musculus L, Raab M, Perez-Ferreiros A, Williams AM, Araujo D, Lindwall M, Ivarsson A. The role of domain-specific and domain-general cognitive functions and skills in sports performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2021;147:1290.
  16. Scharfen HE, Memmert D. Measurement of cognitive functions in experts and elite athletes: a meta-analytic review. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2019;33:843-860. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3526
  17. Enns JT, Richards JC. Visual attentional orienting in developing hockey players. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1997;64:255-275. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.2348
  18. Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. Journal of Sports Sciences 2006; 24:919-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500457109
  19. Kang JO, Kang KD, Lee JW, Nam JJ, Han DH. Comparison of psychological and cognitive characteristics between professional internet game players and professional baseball players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17:4797.
  20. Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM, Wetzel RD. The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): a guide to its development and use;1994.
  21. Sung SM, Kim JH, Yang E, Abrams KY, Lyoo IK. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Temperament and character inventory. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2002;43:235-243. https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2002.30794
  22. Kostering L, Nitschke K, Schumacher FK, Weiller C, Kaller CP. Test-retest reliability of the Tower of London Planning Task (TOL-F). Psychological Assessment 2015;27:925.
  23. Lewis GJ, Lefevre CE, Young AW. Functional architecture of visual emotion recognition ability: a latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2016;145:589.
  24. Habacha H, Lejeune-Poutrain L, Margas N, Molinaro C. Effects of the axis of rotation and primordially solicited limb of high level athletes in a mental rotation task. Human Movement Science 2014;37:58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.002
  25. Habacha H, Molinaro C, Dosseville F. Effects of gender, imagery ability, and sports practice on the performance of a mental rotation task. The American Journal of Psychology 2014;127: 313-323. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.3.0313
  26. McAdams DP, Olson BD. Personality development: continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology 2010;61:517-542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507
  27. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet 2012;380:247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1
  28. Gould D, Carson S. Life skills development through sport: current status and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2008;1:58-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840701834573
  29. Reverdito RS, Fonseca S, Lopes A, Aires K, Santos Alves L, Alves de Lima L, Tavares MA, Goncalves C. Sources of sport satisfaction and perceived self-efficacy among youth in a competitive environment. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2023: 00315125231167460.
  30. Shariati M, Bakhtiari S. Comparison of personality characteristics athlete and non-athlete student, Islamic Azad University of Ahvaz. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011; 30:2312-2315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.450
  31. Blows WT. Child brain development. Nursing Times 2003; 99:28-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200301000-00007
  32. Huizinga M, Dolan CV, Van der Molen MW. Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:2017-2036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.010
  33. Ryckman RM, Hamel J. Perceived physical ability differences in the sport participation motives of young athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology;1993.
  34. Zimmerman BJ, Kitsantas A. Developmental phases in selfregulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology 1997;89:29.
  35. Brown KA, Patel DR, Darmawan D. Participation in sports in relation to adolescent growth and development. Translational Pediatrics 2017;6:150.
  36. Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: a proposal. Archives of General Psychiatry 1987;44:573-588. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180093014
  37. Park IK, Hong SB. The structural relationship among effortreward, julsil, and intention of athletic continuation in collegiate student-athletes. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology 2023;34:97-106. https://doi.org/10.14385/KSSP.34.2.97
  38. Yang E. The effects of goal-setting and reward structures on motor performance. Korean J Phys Educ 1996;35:107-113.
  39. Rodin J, Schooler C, Schaie KW. Self directedness: Cause and effects throughout the life course: Psychology Press;2013.
  40. Nia ME, Besharat MA. Comparison of athletes' personality characteristics in individual and team sports. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010;5:808-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.189
  41. Monasterio E, Mei-Dan O, Hackney AC, Lane AR, Zwir I, Rozsa S, Cloninger CR. Stress reactivity and personality in extreme sport athletes: the psychobiology of BASE jumpers. Physiology & Behavior 2016;167:289-297.
  42. Garcia-Romeu A. Self-transcendence as a measurable transpersonal construct. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 2010;42:26.
  43. Lott GH, Turner BA. Collegiate sport participation and student-athlete development through the lens of emotional intelligence. Journal of Amateur Sport 2018;4:1-28.
  44. Vaughan R, Laborde S. Psychometrics of the emotional intelligence scale in elite, amateur, and non-athletes. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 2018;22:177-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2017.1405811
  45. Cotterill ST, Fransen K. Athlete leadership in sport teams: current understanding and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2016;9:116-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2015.1124443
  46. Northouse PG. Leadership: Theory and practice: Sage publications;2021.
  47. Ozel S, Larue J, Molinaro C. Relation between sport activity and mental rotation: comparison of three groups of subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2002;95(3_suppl):1141-1154. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.3f.1141
  48. Campos JJ, Anderson DI, Barbu-Roth MA, Hubbard EM, Hertenstein MJ, Witherington D. Travel broadens the mind. Infancy 2000;1:149-219. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0102_1
  49. Berg EA. A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. The Journal of General Psychology 1948;39: 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159
  50. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980;32:3-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231