KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Seismic Performance Estimation Service of Bridge through Seismic Risk Assessment

지진위험도평가 방법을 통한 교량의 내진성능 추정 서비스 개발

  • 조한민 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부) ;
  • 이진혁 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부) ;
  • 박기태 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부) ;
  • 김건수 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부) ;
  • 정규산 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부) ;
  • 김재환 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부)
  • Received : 2022.11.24
  • Accepted : 2023.02.14
  • Published : 2023.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In order to understand the seismic performance of a bridge, it is common to review through seismic performance evaluation and numerical analysis of the target bridge. Seismic performance evaluation and review through numerical analysis are analysis methods for specific target bridges, and many problems can arise in each management body managing bridges nationwide. Therefore, in this study, research was conducted to estimate the seismic performance of public bridges with various types and characteristics. Seismic performance was estimated by applying the seismic risk assessment method, calculating the seismic fragility curve for the type and specifications of the bridge, and estimating the seismic performance of the bridge in use by applying the domestic seismic design standard. In addition, by installing it on the platform, service items were established so that users can easily review the estimation of seismic performance of domestic bridges.

교량의 내진성능을 파악하기 위해서는 대상 교량에 대한 내진성능평가 및 수치해석을 통해 검토하는 것이 일반적이다. 내진성능평가 및 수치해석을 통한 검토는 특정 대상교량에 대한 분석 방법으로 전국 교량을 관리하는 각각의 관리주체에서 이를 수행하기에는 많은 문제가 발생할 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 다양한 형식 및 특성을 지니고 있는 공용 교량에 대한 내진성능을 추정할 수 있도록 연구를 수행하였다. 내진성능 추정은 지진위험도평가 방법을 적용하였으며, 교량의 형식 및 제원에 대한 지진취약도 곡선을 산정하고 국내 내진설계기준을 적용하여 공용 중인 교량의 내진성능을 추정하였다. 또한 이를 플랫폼에 탑재하여 사용자가 국내 교량에 대한 내진성능 추정을 간편하게 검토할 수 있도록 서비스 항목을 구축하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 과학기술정보통신부 한국건설기술연구원 연구운영비지원(주요사업) 사업으로 수행되었습니다(과제번호 20230073-001, DNA 기반 노후 교량 구조물 스마트 유지관리 플랫폼 및 활용기술 개발). 본 논문은 2022 CONVENTION 논문을 수정·보완하여 작성되었습니다.

References

  1. Cho, H. M. and Hu, J. W. (2021). "Seismic performance evaluation for piloti structures of MPS seismic isolation device in response to earthquakes on the Richter Scale 7.0 - nonlinear dynamic analysis." KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research, KSCE, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 13-20, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2021.41.1.0013 (in Korean).
  2. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2020). Hazus earthquake model technical manual.
  3. Kim, D. J., Choi, J. H. and Kim, B. H. (2019). "Decision making of seismic performance management using seismic risk assessment." Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, EESK, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 329-339, https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2019.23.6.329 (in Korean).
  4. Kim, D.J., Choi,J. H. and Lee, D. H. (2020). "Seismic performance management of aged road facilities using deterministic method vs. probabilistic method." KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research, KSCE, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 455-463, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2020.40.5.0455 (in Korean).
  5. Kim, S. H., Kim, D. K., Seo, H. Y. and Kim, J. I. (2004). "Fragility curves of seismic retrofitted concrete bridges." Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection, KSMI, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 203-210 (in Korean).
  6. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) (2022). Earthquake statistics (in Korean).
  7. Lee, D. H., Jeong, H. D. and Kim, B. H. (2018). "Seismic fragility analysis of a RC bridge including earthquake intensity range." KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research, KSCE, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 635-643, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2018.38.5.0635 (in Korean).
  8. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2018). Seismic Design Criteria. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (in Korean).
  9. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2022a). Development of decision supporting technology of seismic performance management for aged road facilities (bridges, tunnels, slopes, retaining walls).
  10. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2022b). Facility Management System. Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety (in Korean).
  11. National Disaster Management Research Institute (NDMRI) (2007). Development of Seismic Fragility Function for Bridge Structures in Korea (in Korean).
  12. Seo, H. Y., Yi, J. H., Kim, D. K. and Song, J. K. (2010). "Modified HAZUS method for seismic fragility assessment of domestic PSC-I girder bridges." Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection, KSMI, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 161-170, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2010.14.2.161 (in Korean).
  13. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J. H. and Naganuma, T. (2000). "Statistical analysis of fragility curves." Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 12, pp. 1224-1231, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224).
  14. Song, J. K., Jin, H. S. and Lee, T. H. (2009). "Seismic fragility analysis for probabilistic performance evaluation of PSC box girder bridges." KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research, KSCE, Vol. 29, No. 2A, pp. 119-130 (in Korean).