Evaluation of Pavement Smoothness on Optimized Rehabilitated Section

최소단면 보수지역의 평탄성 평가

  • Received : 2010.04.01
  • Accepted : 2010.05.12
  • Published : 2010.06.15

Abstract

In this study, the profiles of optimized rehabilitated section was measured by a lightweight inertial profiler, and pavement smoothness was evaluated. To analyze the repeatability of the used lightweight profiler, two repeatable measurements were conducted. The agreement between two repeatable measurements were evaluated by Cross-correlation function. Pavement smoothness of the optimized rehabilitated pavement section and existing area was compared in terms of International Roughness Index and Profilograh Index. In general, the pavement smoothness of the rehabilitated sections was not good compared to the existing pavement sections. The analysis results could be used for the evaluation of pavement smoothness of the optimized rehabilitated pavement sections.

본 논문에서는 최소단면 보수가 완료된 아스팔트 콘크리트 포장의 평탄성 평가를 위하여 경량 프로파일러를 이용하여 측정하였으며 평탄성 분석을 실시하였다. 측정 프로파일러의 정확도를 검토하기 위하여 2회 측정한 프로파일을 이용하여 반복성(repeatability) 검증을 수행하였다. Cross-Corelation 함수를 이용하여 측정치간의 일치를 검증하였다. 최소단면 보수가 이루어진 아스팔트 콘크리트 포장 부분과 기존 포장의 평탄성을 국제평탄성지수와 PrI 지수를 비교 분석하였으며, 최소단면 보수가 이루어진 차선의 평탄성이 대체적으로 좋지 않았다. 향후 최소단면 보수 지역의 평탄성 평가에 대한 기초자료로 사용할 수 있다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김낙석, 홍은철. 예방적 최소단면 보수공법 적용 아스팔트 도로포장의 유지관리 비용분석, 한국방재학회 논문집, 제 9권 4호, 2009, pp. 45-51.
  2. Baus, R. and W. Hong. Investigation and Evaluation of Roadway Rideability Equipment and Specifications, Research Report FHWA-SC-99-05, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, USA, 1999.
  3. Karamihas, S. M. and T. D. Gillespie. Assessment of Profiler Performance for Construction Quality Control: Phase I. Research Report UMTRI-2003-1, The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2002.
  4. Karamihas, S. M. Assessment of Profiler Performance for Construction Quality Control with Simulated Profilograph Index, Annual Conference of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., CD-Rom, 2004.
  5. Karamihas, S. M.. Critical Profiler Accuracy Requirements. Research Report UMTRI-2005-24, The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2005.
  6. Smith, K. L., L. Titus-Glover, and L. D. Evans. Pavement Smoothness Index Relationships, Research Report FHWA-RD-02-057, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, USA, 2002.