DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Study on the Rater Reliabilities of Physical Therapy Students Pediatric Balance Scales items

물리치료과 학생들을 대상으로 아동균형척도의 항목별 측정자 신뢰도에 관한 연구

  • Hwang, Ryoung (Department of Physical Therapy, Dongnam Health College) ;
  • Kim, Gi-Won (Department of Physical Therapy, Suwon Women's Collegey)
  • 황룡 (동남보건대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김기원 (수원여자대학교 물리치료과)
  • Received : 2013.02.08
  • Accepted : 2013.02.19
  • Published : 2013.02.28

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine assessment of test-retest reliability for 13 items of pediatric balance scales, then the intrarater reliability among the raters. METHODS: Study participants included 6 children with spastic cerebral palsy who could walk. Raters were consist of seventy-four, 2nd year physical therapy major students. The children's ability to achieve physical balance was wideotaped for PBS items. The raters watched the tapes and evlauated each child twice. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using the Spearman correlation, and interrater reliability was analyzed using the Kendall's coefficient of concordance for ranks. RESULTS: The total PBS scores averaged 49.22 and 50.06 for first and second tests. Test-retest reliability of PBS individual items were between low and high. The low itmes were 3 items, and high were 4 itmes. Interrater reliability were low agreement. CONCLUSION: Based on the study, the pediatric balance scale is an effective evaluating tool for measuring functional balance of school age child. However, the agreement of students or beginner's interpretation is necessary in conjunction to this study results. On top of that, it is important to provide detailed explanation and repetitive training, which improves the analysis reliability. Also, each category subscores level for the pediatric balance scale must be examined carefully in conjunction to performing test, only after improving match quality via preceding practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Bertoti D. Functional neurorehabilitation through the life span. Philadelphia. F.A Davis. 2003:296.
  2. Franjoine MR, Darr N, Held SL et al. The performance of children developing typically on the pediatric balance scale. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22(4):350-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181f9d5eb
  3. Franjoine MR, Gunther JS, Taylor MJ. Pediatric balance scale: a modified version of the berg balance scale for the school-age child with mild to moderate motor impairment. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2003;15(2):114-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PEP.0000068117.48023.18
  4. Gan SM, Tung LC, Tang YH et al. Psychometric Properties of Functional Balance Assessment in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22(6):745-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308316474
  5. Horak FB, Wrisley DM, Frank J. The balance evaluation system test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009;89(5):484-98. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080071
  6. Kembhavi G, Darrah J, Magill-Evans J et al. Usingthebergbalancescaletodistinguishbalance abilities in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2002;14(2):92-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001577-200214020-00005
  7. Kim GW, Hong WS. A study of measurement methods for subtalar joint motion. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(4):57-64. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.22.57
  8. Kim GW, Ko JY, Baek SG. The reliability of a pediatric balance scale based on the raters'clinical work experience and test experience. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(6):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.22.35
  9. Ko JY, Kim GW. Test-retest, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability of a pediatric balance scale in children with cerebral palsy. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(4): 43-8. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.22.43
  10. Ko MS, Lee NH, Lee JA et al. Inter-examiner reliability of the korean version of the pediatric balance scale. Journal of the Korean Academy of University Trained Physical Therapists. 2008;15(1):86-91.
  11. Laffel G, Blumenthal D. The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. JAMA. 1989;262(20):2869-73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03430200113036
  12. Lee CH. Research methodology for physical therapists and occupational therapists. 3rd ed. Seoul. GYe Chuk Mun Wha Sa. 2008:99-108, 275-281, 395-423.
  13. Palisano RJ. Review of research on reliability and validity of the movement assessment of infants. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1989;1(4):157-220. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001577-198901040-00001
  14. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications. 2nd ed. Baltimore. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2001:163-90, 274-84.
  15. Won CW, Rho YG, Kim SY et al. The validity and reliability of Korean activities of daily living(K-ADL) scale. Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society. 2002;6(2): 98-106.
  16. Won JI, Yu KH. Reliability of the functional gait assessment in patients with stroke. Journal of the Korean Academy of University Trained Physical Therapists. 2011; 18(1):64-73.